Trotsky no longer socially relevant?
-
- Posts: 4721
- Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 12:45 am
- Location: New Jersey
Re: Trotsky no longer socially relevant?
perhaps. would you care to list all of your previous incarnations to clarify?
you're saying you were not b0unce?
you're saying you were not b0unce?
TimeableFloat ???S?e?n?d?I?n?f?o
-
- Posts: 6854
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 6:19 pm
Re: Trotsky no longer socially relevant?
Well, I won't stop you, but want to point out that it would be indeed you then, who brings the fight to him, so don't complain about trolling, if he uses means to defend himself that you don't like. It happens so often in these parts...sighleisuremuffin wrote:you'll understand soon enough. I used to defend him in between fights with him too, way back when he was b0unce or henry ford or whoever else.
-
- Posts: 6854
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 6:19 pm
Re: Trotsky no longer socially relevant?
on the off chance he isn't, wouldn't it be better to give him the benefit of the doubt?!leisuremuffin wrote:perhaps. would you care to list all of your previous incarnations to clarify?
you're saying you were not b0unce?
-
- Posts: 4721
- Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 12:45 am
- Location: New Jersey
Re: Trotsky no longer socially relevant?
you haven't "done anything" to me. you've just acted an ass repeatedly and returned for more after multiple bannings. it's annoying, but nothing more than that.
maybe he's not bounce, but he's almost certainly balmer and whatever the one was before that. i draw the line at the racist shit, personally. if he wants to spread his righty political views, that's fine...
maybe he's not bounce, but he's almost certainly balmer and whatever the one was before that. i draw the line at the racist shit, personally. if he wants to spread his righty political views, that's fine...
TimeableFloat ???S?e?n?d?I?n?f?o
-
- Posts: 6302
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 6:21 pm
Re: Trotsky no longer socially relevant?
Yeah, b0unce/dum never espoused libertarian beliefs. Pro-IRA and pro-Palestinian stuff is all I recall.
They just have a similar tone.
Galt is d.reamonn/Steve Ballmer/Jack McCock… and I'm probably missing a couple more.
Funny thing about the recent moderation around here, most forums will ban for multing if they catch it but they must not care here since Galt and 9V have both been pretty open about doing it (ok Galt just hasn't denied it).
They just have a similar tone.
Galt is d.reamonn/Steve Ballmer/Jack McCock… and I'm probably missing a couple more.
Funny thing about the recent moderation around here, most forums will ban for multing if they catch it but they must not care here since Galt and 9V have both been pretty open about doing it (ok Galt just hasn't denied it).
Unsound Designer
-
- Posts: 6854
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 6:19 pm
Re: Trotsky no longer socially relevant?
But that's my point, look at the closed thread on race (The olmos one), there was disagreement, there might have been some derision (but nothing out of the ordinary here). But I would not call his positions racist and there was enough opportunity in that thread were he could have gone all racist, if he indeed were one!leisuremuffin wrote:you haven't "done anything" to me. you've just acted an ass repeatedly and returned for more after multiple bannings. it's annoying, but nothing more than that.
maybe he's not bounce, but he's almost certainly balmer and whatever the one was before that. i draw the line at the racist shit, personally. if he wants to spread his righty political views, that's fine...
Re: Trotsky no longer socially relevant?
Then perhaps I should deny it. I'm honestly enjoying the few discussions we've got going here, and I frequently receive pleasant comments by PM.stringertapper wrote:Funny thing about the recent moderation around here, most forums will ban for multing if they catch it but they must not care here since Galt and 9V have both been pretty open about doing it (ok Galt just hasn't denied it).
So for the record, I'm me and only me.
-
- Posts: 6854
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 6:19 pm
Re: Trotsky no longer socially relevant?
Well, you can be a Macho who uses his women in the dozens and the only quality to him worth mentioning about them is "hot", or you can treat them as equals and be a good socialist.Funk N. Furter wrote:What was misogynistic about anything I said?TomViolenz wrote:Was that in you attempt to liberate those fine girls from the capitalist oppression, or are you playing the misogynist for the peanut gallary... (Which has been banned in case you missed it )in the knowing way of someone who's been with dozens of hot women. And what a night that was!
But you can't be both...
But we all know, you were only trying to show of for the cool kids, and we also know that I really don't care...so let's drop this just so you can save some face...
-
- Posts: 668
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 6:52 pm
Re: Trotsky no longer socially relevant?
Speak for yourself............please, of course! --gotta keep it polite lest Tommy-Boy inundate us with lessons on civility.TomViolenz wrote: But we all know, you were only trying to show of for the cool kids, and we also know that I really don't care...so let's drop this just so you can save some face...
-
- Posts: 6854
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 6:19 pm
Re: Trotsky no longer socially relevant?
Oh that was the royal WE ALLscott nathaniel wrote:Speak for yourself............please, of course! --gotta keep it polite lest Tommy-Boy inundate us with lessons on civility.TomViolenz wrote: But we all know, you were only trying to show of for the cool kids, and we also know that I really don't care...so let's drop this just so you can save some face...
I'm of course only speaking of myself.
Interesting also how Tom always gets to the cute Tommy-boy, almost like a child init?!
Nobody wants to be inundate (whatever that means) by lessons in civility, oh the horror, that people one day don't shit all over the Lounge sofa so to speak.
And if there is one person here who does not deserve my "civility" it's that guy! But I'm glad you are his friend, he has just lost one...
I would be careful though to defend him, I made that mistake once. He turned right around and fucked me in front of everybody. That's the type of friend you are getting here!
-
- Posts: 668
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 6:52 pm
Re: Trotsky no longer socially relevant?
You do shit on the forum; you bullshit. Your civility is bullshit because you have to explicitly state you are being civil. You post didactically and then with self-congratulatory arrogance you self-pat-on-the-back for this self-proclaimed civility.TomViolenz wrote:Oh that was the royal WE ALLscott nathaniel wrote:Speak for yourself............please, of course! --gotta keep it polite lest Tommy-Boy inundate us with lessons on civility.TomViolenz wrote: But we all know, you were only trying to show of for the cool kids, and we also know that I really don't care...so let's drop this just so you can save some face...
I'm of course only speaking of myself.
Interesting also how Tom always gets to the cute Tommy-boy, almost like a child init?!
Nobody wants to be inundate (whatever that means) by lessons in civility, oh the horror, that people one day don't shit all over the Lounge sofa so to speak.
And if there is one person here who does not deserve my "civility" it's that guy! But I'm glad you are his friend, he has just lost one...
Now, for the obligatory Robert Plant quote: Lighten up baby, I'm in love with you.
-
- Posts: 6854
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 6:19 pm
Re: Trotsky no longer socially relevant?
And you know this how? Why have you ever percieved my civility as bull shit? Did we even have ONE discussion with each other?! If not, I think I let the people judge my civility who have.scott nathaniel wrote:You do shit on the forum; you bullshit. Your civility is bullshit because you have to explicitly state you are being civil. You post didactically and then with self-congratulatory arrogance point your self-pat-on-the-back for this self-proclaimed civility.TomViolenz wrote:Oh that was the royal WE ALLscott nathaniel wrote: Speak for yourself............please, of course! --gotta keep it polite lest Tommy-Boy inundate us with lessons on civility.
I'm of course only speaking of myself.
Interesting also how Tom always gets to the cute Tommy-boy, almost like a child init?!
Nobody wants to be inundate (whatever that means) by lessons in civility, oh the horror, that people one day don't shit all over the Lounge sofa so to speak.
And if there is one person here who does not deserve my "civility" it's that guy! But I'm glad you are his friend, he has just lost one...
Now, for the obligatory Robert Plant quote: Lighten up baby, I'm in love with you.
And civility here is not a state either, it's a work in progress, that has to be defended against hecklers like your new friend. I'm sorry if I lose my patience sometimes, but there are a few things I can't stand and whiny bastards, pleading for friendship in PMs, while talking shit about you in a thread you already left is the main one, relevant to this forum.
If this discounts my tries at civility towards everyone else here, so be it...
Last edited by TomViolenz on Tue Nov 12, 2013 10:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 6854
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 6:19 pm
Re: Trotsky no longer socially relevant?
and yet you did itAs for me trying to 'show off' for some supposed 'cool kids', never have I heard anything so pathetic in my entire life.
-
- Posts: 6302
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 6:21 pm
Re: Trotsky no longer socially relevant?
Funknob this will always be the conclusion.Funk N. Furter wrote:I hesitate to spell out the other conclusion one could draw. And it's not gonna be that my jokes aren't funny.
Ok, maybe not always. This was a pretty funny joke:
Funk N. Furter wrote:we in show business
Unsound Designer
-
- Posts: 668
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 6:52 pm
Re: Trotsky no longer socially relevant?
Who and What the eff are you talking about? I don't know what goes on with you behind closed doors nor do I care. What you write here, in the open, is for public consumption. Don't you find it hypocritical of me to critique your posting style with a complaint against your posting style?TomViolenz wrote:
And you know this how? Why have you ever percieved my civility as bull shit? Did we even have ONE discussion with each other?! If not, I think I let the people judge my civility who have.
And civility here is not a state either, it's a work in progress, that has to be defendet against hecklers like your new friend. I'm sorry if I lose my patience sometimes, but there are a few things I can't stand and whiny bastards, pleading for friendship in PMs, while talking shit about you in a thread you already left is the main one, relevant to this forum.
If this discounts my tries at civility towards everyone else here, so be it...
I am sufficiently self-aware to realize this contradiction.