Machinesworking wrote:Capitalism =/= work. The very first assumption you make is wrong. A state run electric company still produces a product with a value. People do this all the time, they confuse trade with an economic system.
Plus, the simple fact is there are more safety nets in (mostly) socialist economies, universal health care etc. less in mostly capitalist economies. So the dying man does better with more socialism. Sweden, Denmark, Switzerland, etc. all have a more socialist, better safety net for that dying man. The person that doesn't do as well is the talentless bureaucrat who inherited a company producing an item of some need to people. Bankers, industrialists etc.
Capitalism is synonymous with the free market. Do deny its potential for production is to claim that human beings are inherently lazy cunts, who, if left to their own devices, would shrivel up and die. But this is not the world we live in. We live in a world where the majority of humans are like this, but—thank God—there are a few great men out there who can produce and inspire.
Socialism, on the other hand, is little more than a faux moral appeal for meddling. It doesn't understand value, production or anything other than its own trumped up flavor of "fairness", which more often than not is unfair.
The dying man is dying no matter which system he is unfortunate enough to bite it under. The only difference is that had he lived under a free market system, at least he will have had a chance at freedom, happiness and a few choice hookers. Balls gotta be emptied, ya ken?