Galt (and bean too, if he has something to say)
-
- Posts: 4721
- Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 12:45 am
- Location: New Jersey
Re: Galt (and bean too, if he has something to say)
TimeableFloat ???S?e?n?d?I?n?f?o
Re: Galt (and bean too, if he has something to say)
Interesting that you'd choose Mandela, who fought against segregation in SA, and Ghandi, who favored it
Tis a fool who looks for logic in the chambers of the human heart...
Tis a fool who looks for logic in the chambers of the human heart...
-
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:46 pm
Re: Galt (and bean too, if he has something to say)
Nope. The Prinsevlag actually predates the apartheid era by a good 20 years, having been adopted as South Africa's national flag in 1928. To claim that it is somehow synonymous with apartheid belies grotesque historical ignorance.TomViolenz wrote:this is the flag that SA only had during the Apartheit era.
Incidentally, it is also the flag that South Africans, black, white and coloured alike, fought under as they battled the Nazis in WW2.
As such, I feel it is a better symbol of Mandela's noble vision of racial unity than the present South African flag, which symbolises little except the country's 20-year slide into its current 3rd world hell-hole status.
Last edited by Bean Machine on Sat Dec 07, 2013 11:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 4721
- Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 12:45 am
- Location: New Jersey
Re: Galt (and bean too, if he has something to say)
Why would you choose that flag, which did fly under apartheid, when the current flag was chosen when Mandela was released from prison? Because you want to re-write history and say that SA was better off before Mandela? Please.
TimeableFloat ???S?e?n?d?I?n?f?o
-
- Posts: 4721
- Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 12:45 am
- Location: New Jersey
Re: Galt (and bean too, if he has something to say)
Galt wrote:Interesting that you'd choose Mandela, who fought against segregation in SA, and Ghandi, who favored it
Tis a fool who looks for logic in the chambers of the human heart...
There are a lot of things about Gandhi that aren't great, but you have to look at the whole picture. Mandela and MLK were able to and both looked up to Gandhi and took inspiration from him. If you aren't impressed by what Gandhi was able to achieve, I don't really understand you at all.
TimeableFloat ???S?e?n?d?I?n?f?o
Re: Galt (and bean too, if he has something to say)
Modern day India—a pinnacle of civilisation.leisuremuffin wrote:There are a lot of things about Gandhi that aren't great, but you have to look at the whole picture. Mandela and MLK were able to and both looked up to Gandhi and took inspiration from him. If you aren't impressed by what Gandhi was able to achieve, I don't really understand you at all.
Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... rofit.html
Re: Galt (and bean too, if he has something to say)
The man Mandela looked up to
-
- Posts: 4721
- Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 12:45 am
- Location: New Jersey
Re: Galt (and bean too, if he has something to say)
Galt wrote:Modern day India—a pinnacle of civilisation.leisuremuffin wrote:There are a lot of things about Gandhi that aren't great, but you have to look at the whole picture. Mandela and MLK were able to and both looked up to Gandhi and took inspiration from him. If you aren't impressed by what Gandhi was able to achieve, I don't really understand you at all.
Civilization?
Anyway, spelling aside, is modern day India ruled by a foreign power?
TimeableFloat ???S?e?n?d?I?n?f?o
-
- Posts: 4721
- Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 12:45 am
- Location: New Jersey
Re: Galt (and bean too, if he has something to say)
I'm surprised that you didn't go for the "Gandhi was a racist" tact this start with. It's all the rage on stormfront where I imagine you spend a lot your time on the internet.
TimeableFloat ???S?e?n?d?I?n?f?o
Re: Galt (and bean too, if he has something to say)
No, I meant "civilisation" as in "civilisation".
If you're going to nitpick, I'd advise you at least consult a dictionary first. Because.
Also, I dunno wot iz Storm Front. Perhaps you could enlighten me, since you are clearly more the expert.
If you're going to nitpick, I'd advise you at least consult a dictionary first. Because.
Also, I dunno wot iz Storm Front. Perhaps you could enlighten me, since you are clearly more the expert.
-
- Posts: 4721
- Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 12:45 am
- Location: New Jersey
Re: Galt (and bean too, if he has something to say)
Forgive me, I'm an American and that's how we spell it here, consider me corrected.
But anyway, is modern India ruled by a foreign power?
As to stormfront, I'm pretty sure you do know what it is, as half of the shit you say comes straight from there. But I'm sure you can use google if you don't.
But anyway, is modern India ruled by a foreign power?
As to stormfront, I'm pretty sure you do know what it is, as half of the shit you say comes straight from there. But I'm sure you can use google if you don't.
TimeableFloat ???S?e?n?d?I?n?f?o
Re: Galt (and bean too, if he has something to say)
Question: If you claim that half the shit I say comes straight there... and let's be honest, I say a helluva lot... how much time exactly do you spend there?leisuremuffin wrote:As to stormfront, I'm pretty sure you do know what it is, as half of the shit you say comes straight from there. But I'm sure you can use google if you don't.
Re: Galt (and bean too, if he has something to say)
So according to you, torturing kids is fine, so long as it remains a local matter. Riiiiiiiight.leisuremuffin wrote:But anyway, is modern India ruled by a foreign power?