That was the fun thing about the MPC renaissance. A grid of 16 touch encoders that sent out notes when touched. Great to make those droplets sounds or drones.yur2die4 wrote:Has anyone made an m4l instrument that lets you 'play' the knobs by strumming them and holding pads for note values etc?? (Or play them like marimbas/percussion. One interesting idea also is that if you hold a 'note' / knob, maybe you can augment it as it is being sustained via knob twisting )
Or chess: http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/chess-for-max/
Edit: okay okay, hear me out. This is only recently becoming more sorted in my head. Imagine that the knobs are to be strummed. But can be twisted to change timbral quality per string. And the velocity would be controlled by pad pressure, as the pads would be held like a fret board. Yeah
is Push now considered 'feature-complete' ?
Re: is Push now considered 'feature-complete' ?
Re: is Push now considered 'feature-complete' ?
Did I hear someone say you can't do fixed length audio? I can.
Re: is Push now considered 'feature-complete' ?
uuuuh!!! how? tell me tell me!!!
Re: is Push now considered 'feature-complete' ?
Hold down "fixed length" and select what you wish.nemoy wrote:uuuuh!!! how? tell me tell me!!!
-
- Posts: 2838
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:27 pm
- Location: UK
- Contact:
Re: is Push now considered 'feature-complete' ?
only works for midi clips, not audio clips, no?eyeknow wrote:Hold down "fixed length" and select what you wish.nemoy wrote:uuuuh!!! how? tell me tell me!!!
[edit] well well! it works when using Push's record button, didn't know that!
it doesn't work when triggering the record-armed clip slots though, which is probably what i've attempted to do in the past and assumed it wasn't possible. good to know cheers!
Re: is Push now considered 'feature-complete' ?
The most annoying thing about push is (back to midi) you can't overdub with the metronome count in
As long as it's a short clip it's not a deal breaker but still annoying as hell.
As long as it's a short clip it's not a deal breaker but still annoying as hell.
Re: is Push now considered 'feature-complete' ?
Yay! well... kind of yay... i never use the rec button for audioclips...garyboozy wrote:[edit] well well! it works when using Push's record button, didn't know that!
it doesn't work when triggering the record-armed clip slots though, which is probably what i've attempted to do in the past and assumed it wasn't possible. good to know cheers!
always triggering that shit from the grid in session mode...
When recordings several different clips one after another,
and on different channels with different instruments... you'd just mess up using the rec button...
I'd prefer fixed lenght audioclip recordings triggered directly via the grid!!
Re: is Push now considered 'feature-complete' ?
Yeah, that whole thing is so confusing to me. I'd be happy if pressing that button simply did what clicking its on-screen equivalent does.eyeknow wrote:The most annoying thing about push is (back to midi) you can't overdub with the metronome count in
As long as it's a short clip it's not a deal breaker but still annoying as hell.
Re: is Push now considered 'feature-complete' ?
We need the abes to start implementing some of this stuff.nemoy wrote:Yay! well... kind of yay... i never use the rec button for audioclips...garyboozy wrote:[edit] well well! it works when using Push's record button, didn't know that!
it doesn't work when triggering the record-armed clip slots though, which is probably what i've attempted to do in the past and assumed it wasn't possible. good to know cheers!
always triggering that shit from the grid in session mode...
When recordings several different clips one after another,
and on different channels with different instruments... you'd just mess up using the rec button...
I'd prefer fixed lenght audioclip recordings triggered directly via the grid!!
-
- Posts: 6854
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 6:19 pm
Re: is Push now considered 'feature-complete' ?
I think the fact that the API was changed so much in the last release (without really anything showing an application for it yet), and that the API changes made it necessary for Stray to adapt his PXT scripts for Push so that he had to drop support for older versions (so they very much affect functionality related to Push), shows that probably some big things are still in store.
Re: is Push now considered 'feature-complete' ?
Yeah, that API runs deep. The great thing is, whatever comes next, we won't need a Mark II to get all of the fun. And Ableton is making an effort to communicate API changes to the people who make custom scripts.TomViolenz wrote:I think the fact that the API was changed so much in the last release (without really anything showing an application for it yet), and that the API changes made it necessary for Stray to adapt his PXT scripts for Push so that he had to drop support for older versions (so they very much affect functionality related to Push), shows that probably some big things are still in store.
I suppose the real answer to the original question is: Push will never be feature complete.
Every time something is added to Live, it will need an API link. Which means a potential feature change for controllers and scripts.
Not everything is even hooked up yet.
For example, there is no API link to the colors of Tracks/Chains inside Drum Racks. So we (or Ableton) can't use those colors to change the Pads on Push to match. Yet...
-
- Posts: 6854
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 6:19 pm
Re: is Push now considered 'feature-complete' ?
That's where I get a little disappointed, the API changes they made seem to go pretty deep, but I don't think simple things like this (and I can't imagine that this is a particularly difficult thing to open up to the API without breaking anything) have been adressed.hoffman2k wrote: For example, there is no API link to the colors of Tracks/Chains inside Drum Racks. So we (or Ableton) can't use those colors to change the Pads on Push to match. Yet...
And as long as things are not open to the API not even third party developers like Stray can give us the functionality. (The workaround using Bomes MT that Stray uses in PXT Live Plus nonwithstanding)
I, for instance would love to have access to the five parameters that make up the grooves!
Imagine how groovy these step-sequenced drum patterns could sound, if you could adjust these on the fly from Push. As it is, changing the grooves live is a total non-issue (apart from the global groove amount, but that really doesn't do it for me)
Re: is Push now considered 'feature-complete' ?
Not matching colors... but I would like to point out something very cool that Stray did with PXT.... In the script text you can assign colors to sounds in drum racks....hoffman2k wrote:there is no API link to the colors of Tracks/Chains inside Drum Racks. So we (or Ableton) can't use those colors to change the Pads on Push to match. Yet...
PAD_COLOR_TO_NAME = RED_FULL, Snare, Snr, rim, sd
PAD_COLOR_TO_NAME = PURPLE_FULL, Kick, BD, kik, kic, sub
PAD_COLOR_TO_NAME = WHITE_FULL, hat, hh
In this example all my snares are red (full brightness), my Kicks are purple and my high hats are white. it all works auto-magically for any patch I load up or any samples I dump onto pads, As long as the name of the sample has a version of the name of the sound in it (so a Kick drum named 'Pepsi-cola.wav' won't work in this example) But what is cool is you choose and add as many tags as you want and choose all your own colors to represent.
This is one of my favorite Features of PXT that I almost never see anyone mention.
-
- Posts: 6854
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 6:19 pm
Re: is Push now considered 'feature-complete' ?
Isn't that only a functionality found in PXT Live PLUS?! If I'm not mistaken he needed to do a workaround using Bomes MT to get this to work.
I will start using it, if it shows up in different parts of PXT Live PLUS as well. I would like the poly-sub mode of the step sequencer to start using these colors. That would be very usefull!
I will start using it, if it shows up in different parts of PXT Live PLUS as well. I would like the poly-sub mode of the step sequencer to start using these colors. That would be very usefull!
Re: is Push now considered 'feature-complete' ?
Sorry, yes you're right, that is the Plus extension. And yeah, I would love to be able to access those colors wherever DrumRack pads are (including default push... cause I use default just as much as PXT)