Make Push 2 wireless
Make Push 2 wireless
I know there was some discussion three or four years ago about ways to make Ableton Push 2 wireless. Nothing seemed to be a good working option. Any modern solutions?
-
- Posts: 4500
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 6:38 am
Re: Make Push 2 wireless
Question really is have you seen any wireless solutions for USB?
Considering the speeds needed for bi-directional USB and the requirement for low latency, probably not a thing that will happen. Also, you may get rid of the wire between hardware and computer, but you still need a cable for power.
Designing something like Push to work via a wireless network connection would be the way to go, but not sure of the demand to have something liek Push be wireless.
Considering the speeds needed for bi-directional USB and the requirement for low latency, probably not a thing that will happen. Also, you may get rid of the wire between hardware and computer, but you still need a cable for power.
Designing something like Push to work via a wireless network connection would be the way to go, but not sure of the demand to have something liek Push be wireless.
Re: Make Push 2 wireless
Will be Push 3 then. Internal battery in combination with wireless charging could be an option. Not sure how much difference there would be between wifi and bluetooth and which one would be better in regard to latency and energy consumption. Ableton Link seems to work ok though (no experience). Doesn't have to be a big battery like a laptop I assume so it could fit in a push form factor (maybe a bit higher or bulkier somewhere.
Re: Make Push 2 wireless
The display needs fast data, just midi with no display could work over bluetooth though.
You could do it with wifi, the Push could connect to your wifi or create its own wifi network if there is no existing wifi network available. The latency would be an issue though.
Wireless is something I wouldn't want with the extra cost/complexity, and I would never use it.
You could do it with wifi, the Push could connect to your wifi or create its own wifi network if there is no existing wifi network available. The latency would be an issue though.
Wireless is something I wouldn't want with the extra cost/complexity, and I would never use it.
-
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2016 10:01 pm
Re: Make Push 2 wireless
Hi there! I try to research this theme too. I have found this device: http://cdm.link/2006/06/wireless-midi-i ... 80m-range/
that hypothetical may be suitable, but it needs to be tested.
It is complicated also by the fact that this device is not made anymore.
Mission impossible! I like it!*)
that hypothetical may be suitable, but it needs to be tested.
It is complicated also by the fact that this device is not made anymore.
Mission impossible! I like it!*)
-
- Posts: 4500
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 6:38 am
Re: Make Push 2 wireless
That's a wireless MIDI device, not wireless USB, completely different beast. The fact it is hard to find something like that should start to indicate how difficult it is to make something like that reliable and with low enough latency to not affect the user.KuzmaKuznetsov wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2019 9:59 pmHi there! I try to research this theme too. I have found this device: http://cdm.link/2006/06/wireless-midi-i ... 80m-range/
that hypothetical may be suitable, but it needs to be tested.
It is complicated also by the fact that this device is not made anymore.
Mission impossible! I like it!*)
Remember, Push is not a MIDI device, it is USB and there is far more going on than just some simple CC commands. For a start you have a full colour screen with a lot of data going to it.
The reason you do not see wireless USB senders is because of bandwidth, latency and reliability issues. USB is designed for fast communication direct with a PC and does not deal well with dropouts and interference. For example, a 5G WIFI connection can yield (at best) 450Mb/s if you have a 3 channel transceiver but in theory that is far more likely to be about 350Mb/s or less if you have multiple devices. A single antenna system is more like 70Mb/s. Far lower than the constant 400Mb/s needed for USB2. USB3+ can deliver many Gb of data a second which is far beyond the scope of wireless communications and impossible to xmit over wifi
To make Push wireless it would have to have its own CPU and communication protocol to handle wireless communication so it would need to be a whole new unit. It could be achieved, how the latency and response would be will be interesting, but apart from some convenience in some situations are there really that many situations, other than jamming on the couch or saving a cable run at a live venue (which face it, would you trust a wifi connection anyway) where it would be that used? Especially if it added $150 for instance to the cost of each unit.
Re: Make Push 2 wireless
I don't understand people's obsession with "wireless" everything.
I put wireless in quotes because any "wireless" device will still need either batteries, or wires for a power supply.
So usually the complexity (problems!) and cost far outweigh any convenience advantages there might be.
For something like a Push, a large and not-really-portable unit with a power-hungry screen and lots of LEDs that would definitely need plug in power anyway, it just seems like a silly idea.
I put wireless in quotes because any "wireless" device will still need either batteries, or wires for a power supply.
So usually the complexity (problems!) and cost far outweigh any convenience advantages there might be.
For something like a Push, a large and not-really-portable unit with a power-hungry screen and lots of LEDs that would definitely need plug in power anyway, it just seems like a silly idea.
-
- Posts: 898
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 2:43 pm
- Location: Kent
Re: Make Push 2 wireless
Wont happen until they can get latency really low,
Live 11, M1 Mac Mini, Push 2, Scarlett 18i20 & ADA8200, Softube Console 1 Mk2, Deepmind12, Hydrasynth, Cobalt 8M, Moog Subsequent 25, IK Uno Synth Pro, Plethora X3, Nord Drum 3P