it really depends on if you're a faith no more fan or notleisuremuffin wrote:maybe the op should learn to articulate himself better. If you post a thread with the title "i hate improvised music," with 5 sentences of content, this is what you get.
what kind of music is the OP talking about? What kind of music you talking about? how much do i actually care?
.lm.
leisuremuffin wrote:maybe the op should learn to articulate himself better.
lol.mr.ergonomics wrote:a lot of people seems to know what I mean
'Re-define' usually means that they understood what the fuck they were talking about in the first place.mikemc wrote:should not be allowed to re-define the term "improvising music".
Yeh Miles Davis was miles ahead.citizenchris099 wrote:The modal works of Miles Davis certainly had a structure in the frame work of the overall arrangement though the solos were allowed a great deal of freedom. Coltrane's later period free jazz work by comparison was much more free form. My point being..both are considered "improvisational" though each has a different approach.
Those trying to pigeon hole this or that as being what improv truly is are a bit myopic in their view if you ask me.
chapelier fou wrote:Thanks Tone deft for your kind words, although I don't understand everything. BTW, I don't know what FFS is. Sorry for the OT.
Yeh thats ethnocentrism, to assume that everybody understands these internet abbreviations.cyclyk wrote:chapelier fou wrote:Thanks Tone deft for your kind words, although I don't understand everything. BTW, I don't know what FFS is. Sorry for the OT.
FFS> for fuck's sake (bordel de merde chez nous en gros)
It's also ethnocentrism to think that a culture should adapt to your culture. This is the internet after all.derzai wrote:Yeh thats ethnocentrism, to assume that everybody understands these internet abbreviations.
That's a great statement man!3dot... wrote:one of the beautiful things about jazz ... is when one is playing the rest of the band are listening... and reacting accordingly...
there's a structure ... but it's loose...
no, since you want to call names, it's assuming people have the basic common sense to use google. there's little sense in asking what words mean anymore, you can even translate entire paragraphs from other languages into your own language.derzai wrote:Yeh thats ethnocentrism, to assume that everybody understands these internet abbreviations.cyclyk wrote:chapelier fou wrote:Thanks Tone deft for your kind words, although I don't understand everything. BTW, I don't know what FFS is. Sorry for the OT.
FFS> for fuck's sake (bordel de merde chez nous en gros)
ah! indeed.LoopStationZebra wrote:'Re-define' usually means that they understood what the fuck they were talking about in the first place.mikemc wrote:should not be allowed to re-define the term "improvising music".
point taken.I won't even try, you'll correct yourself eventually anyway.Tone Deft wrote:jazz is for people that play it or jackasses that want to appear sophisticated.
win.starving student wrote:I won't even try, you'll correct yourself eventually anyway.Tone Deft wrote:jazz is for people that play it or jackasses that want to appear sophisticated.