general question about audio vs. midi
general question about audio vs. midi
Was just wondering.. for the sake of general knowledge..
Say there are 2 projects. One project consists of 10 audio tracks.. where beats and instruments are all recorded audio files to be processed. The other project then consists of 10 midi tracks.. where midi notes are tied to virtual software instruments. Each midi track is also of a different midi instrument. Both projects are also full of processing effects for each track and also on the master.
Is it right to assume that the project with only audio files consumes much less computer resources than the one with midi?
Cheers,
Justin
Say there are 2 projects. One project consists of 10 audio tracks.. where beats and instruments are all recorded audio files to be processed. The other project then consists of 10 midi tracks.. where midi notes are tied to virtual software instruments. Each midi track is also of a different midi instrument. Both projects are also full of processing effects for each track and also on the master.
Is it right to assume that the project with only audio files consumes much less computer resources than the one with midi?
Cheers,
Justin
-
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 3:31 am
- Location: Florida
Re: general question about audio vs. midi
if by computer resources you mean CPU yeah, yes, to your question above.epjl2000 wrote:Is it right to assume that the project with only audio files consumes much less computer resources than the one with midi?
but, like I think ShelLuser was trying to say, if by computer resources you mean your computer in general... then audio could potentially use a lot more if you count the hard drive space to store the data, RAM (buffer) etc. I don't think this part is what you're asking about though...
LoopStationZebra wrote:it's like a hipster commie pinko manifesto. Rambling. Angry. Nearly divorced from all reality; yet strangely compelling with a ring of truth.
-
- Posts: 518
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 5:33 pm
Re: general question about audio vs. midi
I have question too...
What do you think has a better quality, vst-instruments in midi-tracks or
recorded to audio.
I mean all with full effects like comps and EQ and so on...!
I like to know, because just midi-projects save a lot of space and time.
I have a Quad-Core 2.83Gh, so I never have problems with CPU power...
I mostly run my projects in pure midi stage and real-time, but another friend
keeps saying that he feels that audio-tracks are more stable to him.
I have some sounds that I have recorded to audio because the effects I used had a own drive and never repeat a sound in the same place because of LFO-Cycles.
So I record them only and use the parts that fit, but that's it...
O.K. now...! What do you think has better quality?
I would like to make this clear...
Thank You
What do you think has a better quality, vst-instruments in midi-tracks or
recorded to audio.
I mean all with full effects like comps and EQ and so on...!
I like to know, because just midi-projects save a lot of space and time.
I have a Quad-Core 2.83Gh, so I never have problems with CPU power...
I mostly run my projects in pure midi stage and real-time, but another friend
keeps saying that he feels that audio-tracks are more stable to him.
I have some sounds that I have recorded to audio because the effects I used had a own drive and never repeat a sound in the same place because of LFO-Cycles.
So I record them only and use the parts that fit, but that's it...
O.K. now...! What do you think has better quality?
I would like to make this clear...
Thank You
No! I'll never use the Push-App Live 9 !!!
-
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 8:30 am
Re: general question about audio vs. midi
You're using different resources with audio vs. MIDI.
You can gum up your hard drive if you have too many audio tracks playing at once. (Even some VSTs can cause problems with the hard drive if you use sample based instruments. Things like Stylus, Atmosphere, Nexus, or just multi-samplers like Sampler or Halion.) The effect would be audio drop-outs or missing voices/instruments, even though the CPU may not be pushed very hard.
You can set audio clips to be RAM based to help this.
Also, you will (as has been mentioned) use up more hard drive space with audio clips.
MIDI tracks controlling VST instruments will consume CPU, depending on the instrument. (Massive will consume more than something like Z3ta+ or Analog.)
You can gum up your hard drive if you have too many audio tracks playing at once. (Even some VSTs can cause problems with the hard drive if you use sample based instruments. Things like Stylus, Atmosphere, Nexus, or just multi-samplers like Sampler or Halion.) The effect would be audio drop-outs or missing voices/instruments, even though the CPU may not be pushed very hard.
You can set audio clips to be RAM based to help this.
Also, you will (as has been mentioned) use up more hard drive space with audio clips.
MIDI tracks controlling VST instruments will consume CPU, depending on the instrument. (Massive will consume more than something like Z3ta+ or Analog.)
Re: general question about audio vs. midi
It's personal preference if you ask me, there shouldn't be a quality difference. Of course that'll depend on the settings you have for recording/freezing but it's much of a muchness if they're good enough. Some people seem to like to get things bounced to audio as soon as possible, others will go with MIDI till the very end, it's a question of workflow and preference.simpli.cissimus wrote:I have question too...
What do you think has a better quality, vst-instruments in midi-tracks or
recorded to audio.
I mean all with full effects like comps and EQ and so on...!
I like to know, because just midi-projects save a lot of space and time.
I have a Quad-Core 2.83Gh, so I never have problems with CPU power...
I mostly run my projects in pure midi stage and real-time, but another friend
keeps saying that he feels that audio-tracks are more stable to him.
I have some sounds that I have recorded to audio because the effects I used had a own drive and never repeat a sound in the same place because of LFO-Cycles.
So I record them only and use the parts that fit, but that's it...
O.K. now...! What do you think has better quality?
Sounds like you're on the right track... it seems you find MIDI easier to work with but like audio in some situations, just keep doing what makes sense to you the quality is a non-issue.
-
- Posts: 518
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 5:33 pm
Re: general question about audio vs. midi
simonlb wrote:It's personal preference if you ask me, there shouldn't be a quality difference. Of course that'll depend on the settings you have for recording/freezing but it's much of a muchness if they're good enough. Some people seem to like to get things bounced to audio as soon as possible, others will go with MIDI till the very end, it's a question of workflow and preference.simpli.cissimus wrote:I have question too...
What do you think has a better quality, vst-instruments in midi-tracks or
recorded to audio.
I mean all with full effects like comps and EQ and so on...!
I like to know, because just midi-projects save a lot of space and time.
I have a Quad-Core 2.83Gh, so I never have problems with CPU power...
I mostly run my projects in pure midi stage and real-time, but another friend
keeps saying that he feels that audio-tracks are more stable to him.
I have some sounds that I have recorded to audio because the effects I used had a own drive and never repeat a sound in the same place because of LFO-Cycles.
So I record them only and use the parts that fit, but that's it...
O.K. now...! What do you think has better quality?
Sounds like you're on the right track... it seems you find MIDI easier to work with but like audio in some situations, just keep doing what makes sense to you the quality is a non-issue.
Thank You !
This clears my thought I had and makes me more confident...
Cheers
No! I'll never use the Push-App Live 9 !!!
-
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 8:30 am
Re: general question about audio vs. midi
Stability is an interesting point.
I've had software instruments just forget patches. Or make them sound different when you reload the project. If you record to audio you eliminate the chance of that.
In D&B bouncing to audio seems to be endemic, with producers creating beats, bouncing down, adding more layers of percussion, bouncing down etc. etc. (Every time adding more compression and distortion...)
(Or making a bass sound, bouncing down, loading it into a sampler, then playing it on that.)
It's definitely true that it's easier to chop up a single audio loop than it is to chop up a large array of MIDI instruments and audio loops at once. With extra control comes more expensive workflow.
There's another consideration. If you have the original instrument there, you may be tempted to tweak it... I've lost many an hour (and many a good sound) that way...
More and more I'm bouncing down tracks and tucking the original away in a group track. Just in case.
I've had software instruments just forget patches. Or make them sound different when you reload the project. If you record to audio you eliminate the chance of that.
In D&B bouncing to audio seems to be endemic, with producers creating beats, bouncing down, adding more layers of percussion, bouncing down etc. etc. (Every time adding more compression and distortion...)
(Or making a bass sound, bouncing down, loading it into a sampler, then playing it on that.)
It's definitely true that it's easier to chop up a single audio loop than it is to chop up a large array of MIDI instruments and audio loops at once. With extra control comes more expensive workflow.
There's another consideration. If you have the original instrument there, you may be tempted to tweak it... I've lost many an hour (and many a good sound) that way...
More and more I'm bouncing down tracks and tucking the original away in a group track. Just in case.