simmerdown wrote:republican humor seems to be rooted in smug superiority...
Apparently you've never watched Rachael Maddow.
simmerdown wrote:republican humor seems to be rooted in smug superiority...
stringtapper wrote:starving student wrote:I see what you did there, filling in my actual quotes with little periods, in effect re-writing what I wrote to make a statement I didn't say. That is so beyond clever of you st, as a matter of fact I would say it's super genius of you, no one will be able to see through that one why you've just about pulled the wool over the eyes of the quilter with that one, cheers mate you're really on to something.
Uh, no. I didn't "rewrite" jack shit by highlighting the main points of your quote.
Here's the main "sentence" I was targeting (I have to cut somewhere because you don't really write grammatical sentences):
Guess what? Still means the same thing in "English." You're claiming that your question has nothing to do with the potential person answering being Republican which just isn't true. Unless you're changing it now??starving student wrote:there's nothing wrong with being a republican I don't know why anyone would rant about that, it has nothing to do with the question I asked but
Nobody rewrote anything. No its just another example of how you have a really hard time staying coherent in a discussion about things like this. I'm guessing because you're so emotionally involved in it all.
starving student wrote:so beats you don't think that the passions are a little higher than what party line syndrome would generally muster ?
I actually don't think she's that intelligent, but I enjoy her show. It's way too much about smarmy entertainment, and in that respect there's very little difference from the folks at Fox News. Olbermann was the same way, but also loved his show and miss it...starving student wrote: @ loops re rachel maddow, but what do you think of her research team, her humor isn't really my taste but
I love how she leads and exits with facts, there's like more facts in one of her broadcast than fox can get together in a whole months worth of broadcasting, in that way she's refreshing?
Exactly! I do believe one of the prerequisites to obtaining the Rhodes Scholarship is to be lacking in intelligenceLoopStationZebra wrote:
I actually don't think she's that intelligent, but I enjoy her show
She's smart enough to know it's fun to eat pussy.I actually don't think she's that intelligent, but I enjoy her show.
no way man, she's got quite a noggin on her shoulders, but more importantly her whole teams foundation is about gathering facts, jokes aside she definitely does not do what fox does for instance fox says obama lost 92 percent of womens jobs or something like that and they kindly forgot to include the fact that they were including the millions of jobs lost to women before he even got into office and they even included the women who lost their jobs on the day he was sworn it,,, rachel never does shit like that. another thing she does on a regular basis without hesitation is issue retractions if something she puts out is incorrect, she'll even issue retractions for shit that just flew over someones head and was misconstrued, fox will never retract anything (well they might) but no where near as much or in the way that she does. on top of all of that people treat her like vomit, she does not treat people like that even if they come at her that way, that's something I can always find respect in even though I don't practice that ethos enough myself.LoopStationZebra wrote:I actually don't think she's that intelligent, but I enjoy her show. It's way too much about smarmy entertainment, and in that respect there's very little difference from the folks at Fox News. Olbermann was the same way, but also loved his show and miss it...starving student wrote: @ loops re rachel maddow, but what do you think of her research team, her humor isn't really my taste but
I love how she leads and exits with facts, there's like more facts in one of her broadcast than fox can get together in a whole months worth of broadcasting, in that way she's refreshing?
Facts? Hmm. More often as not the issues on both sides are presented with an array of 'facts' that really are more or less 'half-truths'. Mention anything about the economy on MSNBC and chances are they'll leave out some critical counter-point because it flies in the face of their position. Same with Fox.
Both are merely extensions of their respective parties. Nothing more, nothing less.
The chicks are definitely hotter on Fox, though. No doubt.
beats me wrote:starving student wrote:so beats you don't think that the passions are a little higher than what party line syndrome would generally muster ?
Passions are higher when somebody’s personal economy is fucked and they mistakenly think the government fixes the economy. It doesn’t. Big business fucks up and fixes the economy, but when the economy improves and stabilizes whoever is in office will get and accept credit for it.
I'm sure some proud republicans will show sooner or latersporkles wrote:Six pages and still no conclusion?