lowshelf wrote:Pam!
White House has to respond to demand to build a Death Star
Re: White House has to respond to demand to build a Death Star
-
- Posts: 10586
- Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 5:57 pm
- Contact:
Re: White House has to respond to demand to build a Death Star
Forge. wrote:
^I wonder if this marks the first time I totally agree with LSZ on something political!
*sends Forge a Pint of his fav...*
I came for the
But stayed for the
But stayed for the
Re: White House has to respond to demand to build a Death Star
]LoopStationZebra wrote:Forge. wrote:
^I wonder if this marks the first time I totally agree with LSZ on something political!
*sends Forge a Pint of his fav...*
thanks but i finally quit drinking. No more alien interviews for me.
I suppose fav could include lemon squash.v
Re: White House has to respond to demand to build a Death Star
oh we've definitely played our part in Afghanistan... going back 150 years... and also because of paranoia about the Russians.beats me wrote:lowshelf wrote:> as if the place was a peaceful utopia of human rights
From what pictures I've seen and accounts I've read of the time, Afg was beautiful in the 60s and 70s.
This was before the US-instigated (according to Zbigniew Brzezinski, NSA under Carter) Russian invasion, and later hardline Taliban types funded entirely by Western govs and Saudis. So yeah, round of applause.
> another decade or two after another group of “folks” launch an attack on the west.
UH HUH.
Somebody from the UK scolding against invasion, starting wars, and leaving a region in worse shape than when they arrived. Did somebody spike your tea?
But this is exactly my point... US AND UK (and SOVIET) interference is what lead to these douches in the first place.
Kabul in 1970:
today:
Re: White House has to respond to demand to build a Death Star
they've raised nearly 400k for it
http://rt.com/usa/news/death-star-const ... arter-847/
how you would feel about that if you were starving to death or lost your home...?!
http://rt.com/usa/news/death-star-const ... arter-847/
how you would feel about that if you were starving to death or lost your home...?!
Re: White House has to respond to demand to build a Death Star
^ better. shit. it costs more than quadruple that for a SCUD missile.
Re: White House has to respond to demand to build a Death Star
That's a shit argument and you know it.beats me wrote: Somebody from the UK scolding against invasion, starting wars, and leaving a region in worse shape than when they arrived. Did somebody spike your tea?
But if you really want to play that game, my ancestors stayed at home when others sailed off to start a new life on someone else's land.
Re: White House has to respond to demand to build a Death Star
andydes wrote:That's a shit argument and you know it.beats me wrote: Somebody from the UK scolding against invasion, starting wars, and leaving a region in worse shape than when they arrived. Did somebody spike your tea?
But if you really want to play that game, my ancestors stayed at home when others sailed off to start a new life on someone else's land.
Anything that happened in the last 100 years is a valid argument, 2,000 years if you are a Christian.
Re: White House has to respond to demand to build a Death Star
Fine, pick an arbitrary number of years of history I should feel guilty for.beats me wrote:
Anything that happened in the last 100 years is a valid argument, 2,000 years if you are a Christian.
Your argument sounds like the current dispute with Argentina. A bunch of Latin Americans complaining that the Falklands is a product of European colonialism.
But since you've picked 100 years, what have we done in the last century that we haven't done with the US? Apart from voluntarily dismantle the old empire, of course.
Re: White House has to respond to demand to build a Death Star
andydes wrote:Fine, pick an arbitrary number of years of history I should feel guilty for.beats me wrote:
Anything that happened in the last 100 years is a valid argument, 2,000 years if you are a Christian.
Your argument sounds like the current dispute with Argentina. A bunch of Latin Americans complaining that the Falklands is a product of European colonialism.
But since you've picked 100 years, what have we done in the last century that we haven't done with the US? Apart from voluntarily dismantle the old empire, of course.
Where were you when I actually made that comment about a month ago? I no longer have the steam or interest in discussing it.
Re: White House has to respond to demand to build a Death Star
Oh, right. Wasn't following the dates. Thought this all popped up recently.
But what hot topics do we have now? One prolific poster has retired and another had his thread erased.
But what hot topics do we have now? One prolific poster has retired and another had his thread erased.
Re: White House has to respond to demand to build a Death Star
andydes wrote:Oh, right. Wasn't following the dates. Thought this all popped up recently.
But what hot topics do we have now? One prolific poster has retired and another had his thread erased.
We're still free to bash on straight white men.
Re: White House has to respond to demand to build a Death Star
fixed for accuracy.beats me wrote:andydes wrote:Oh, right. Wasn't following the dates. Thought this all popped up recently.
But what hot topics do we have now? One prolific poster has retired and another had his thread erased.
We're still free to bash on straight, American, white men... especially if they're Christian
or am i off base?
i can't say i remember the last time i saw someone come to the interwebz aid of any of that group on this forum. prostitutes, sadomasochists, and hedonists of all backgrounds and persuasions will be feverishly defended first.