It's a good question.Funk N. Furter wrote:The Mafia are bad, obviously, but are they as bad as my jokes?
Socialism will save us all (technology edition)
-
- Posts: 6302
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 6:21 pm
Re: Socialism will save us all (technology edition)
Unsound Designer
-
- Posts: 1480
- Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:22 am
- Contact:
Re: Socialism will save us all (technology edition)
It's really too bad this forum is overrun with mults and grown men who can't post without emoticons. Could be such a nice place...
-
- Posts: 6302
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 6:21 pm
Re: Socialism will save us all (technology edition)
You should have been here before the Lounge. It was even nastier and all happening in what is now Music and Production.
Unsound Designer
-
- Posts: 6302
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 6:21 pm
Re: Socialism will save us all (technology edition)
And after all this is the Lounge. If you're expecting it to be a place for rigorous debate and sharp witted conversation you've come to the wrong place. That would be like me expecting to discuss advanced Neo-Riemannian transformational voice-leading analysis of extended chromatic harmony here. I'm not holding my breath.
Unsound Designer
Re: Socialism will save us all (technology edition)
That sounds nice!LoopStationZebra wrote:the world was sitting around talking about organic farming techniques and Best Practices in drum circle techniques
Re: Socialism will save us all (technology edition)
Funk N. Furter wrote:SuburbanThug wrote:It's really too bad this forum is overrun with mults and grown men who can't post without emoticons. Could be such a nice place...
Re: Socialism will save us all (technology edition)
the sturmtruppen nihilist guy here "discussing in rigorous debate"?! The only things he could debate would be "to be mario or not to be mario" while playing on the playstation and eating salsa with loopstationzebra...stringtapper wrote:And after all this is the Lounge. If you're expecting it to be a place for rigorous debate and sharp witted conversation you've come to the wrong place. That would be like me expecting to discuss advanced Neo-Riemannian transformational voice-leading analysis of extended chromatic harmony here. I'm not holding my breath.
-
- Posts: 6302
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 6:21 pm
Re: Socialism will save us all (technology edition)
^ Case in point.myrnova wrote:the sturmtruppen nihilist guy here "discussing in rigorous debate"?! The only things he could debate would be "to be mario or not to be mario" while playing on the playstation and eating salsa with loopstationzebra...stringtapper wrote:If you're expecting… sharp witted conversation you've come to the wrong place.
Unsound Designer
-
- Posts: 6302
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 6:21 pm
Re: Socialism will save us all (technology edition)
And Mario is a Nintendo property doofus.
Unsound Designer
-
- Posts: 6302
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 6:21 pm
Re: Socialism will save us all (technology edition)
I think LSZ's formatting on Heisenwong kind of gimped out your little joke there Aloysius.
Unsound Designer
Re: Socialism will save us all (technology edition)
Professor Stringtrapper aka "the nihilist" discussing "advanced Neo-Riemannian transformational voice-leading analysis of extended chromatic harmony" with his emeritus collegue Loopstationzebra aka "padman":
-
- Posts: 6302
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 6:21 pm
Re: Socialism will save us all (technology edition)
You're in luck, one of Joe Straus's in depth papers on the subject is available in full:
Voice Leading in Set-class Space by Joesph N. Straus
Voice Leading in Set-class Space by Joesph N. Straus
Unsound Designer
-
- Posts: 1480
- Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:22 am
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 6302
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 6:21 pm
Re: Socialism will save us all (technology edition)
Care to elaborate?SuburbanThug wrote:Dissonance.
Unsound Designer