This:Funk N. Furter wrote:Yes. What the fuck has that got to do with the price of fish?Forge. wrote:
Aren't you unemployed?
Funk N. Furter wrote:
You do not understand the concept of worker because you are not one.
This:Funk N. Furter wrote:Yes. What the fuck has that got to do with the price of fish?Forge. wrote:
Aren't you unemployed?
Funk N. Furter wrote:
You do not understand the concept of worker because you are not one.
how many peasants are there in England?Funk N. Furter wrote:Peasants rent a small piece of land and grow food to eat. .
Qualify "most" and "serious", as used in this sentence.Funk N. Furter wrote:Tell you what though, you just make up random definitions and terminology off the top of your head Forge, and I'll use ones understood by most of the world's population and still used by serious commentators.
So... in otherwords no longer relevant? And wait... they stopped being relevant after the capitalists took power, but they're still included in the list of 4 groups along with the capitalists? how does that work?Funk N. Furter wrote:Virtually zero, obviously. Peasants are a feudal phenomenon, and feudalism was abolished after the bourgeois revolution, ie the civil war, in which the capitalists took power.Forge. wrote:how many peasants are there in England?Funk N. Furter wrote:Peasants rent a small piece of land and grow food to eat. .
you mean like "poor" or "99%"?Funk N. Furter wrote:Tell you what though, you just make up random definitions and terminology off the top of your head Forge, and I'll use ones understood by most of the world's population and still used by serious commentators.
I tripped out for a minute then and thought you'd started talking about CDs in the wrong threadlowshelf wrote:Interesting disc. Agree the labels don't fit comfortably nowadays. .
see I think this is what pisses me off about it. Maybe I've been spoiled living in Australia, but I only ever hear the word "class" in the UK.Funk N. Furter wrote:
Poor can include any class, it means a certain income. 99% is a number.
Interesting how both you and Myrnova hold such strong beliefs, yet are both completely incapable of substantiating them. Is this how you expect to win all debates—by simply repeating ad infinitium?Funk N. Furter wrote:Not youJack McOck wrote:Qualify "most" and "serious", as used in this sentence.Funk N. Furter wrote:Tell you what though, you just make up random definitions and terminology off the top of your head Forge, and I'll use ones understood by most of the world's population and still used by serious commentators.
Funk N. Furter wrote: I am trying to tell you how the world actually is, and I'm not clinging to anything.
You cannot make sense of the world if you do not differentiate between employers and employees, and if you lump everyone who is not in the top 1% together.
Funk N. Furter wrote:Imagine you had a government that only acted in the interests of people who own large companies, and acted against the interests of their employees. Let's take it to extremes to highlight things. Let's say they banned all strikes and trade unions, and the employers reduced wages to half of what they are now, but prices stayed the same. So you could only get a half of what you used to get with your wages. Let's say this meant you had to choose between heating or food.
In England, maybe? In Italy the so-called "latifundium" (landlordism) still exists in the south. Sometimes it is even worse, the servants are not even peasants, they have become slaves (african immigrants). In the third world, parts of south america, asia and africa peasants are still many.Funk N. Furter wrote:Virtually zero, obviously. Peasants are a feudal phenomenon, and feudalism was abolished after the bourgeois revolution, ie the civil war, in which the capitalists took power.Forge. wrote:how many peasants are there in England?Funk N. Furter wrote:Peasants rent a small piece of land and grow food to eat. .
so you think people should all just accept their lot, that they are either an alpha, beta, gamma or delta, otherwise the Nazis will sneak in again?Funk N. Furter wrote:It's muddled thinking about class that allows people like Nazis or Tories into power, it's extremely dangerous, by the way.
is that your attempt at getting me back for the Rik comment?Funk N. Furter wrote: A bit like Peter Andre.
Great post myrnova! (Tick)myrnova wrote:In England, maybe? In Italy the so-called "latifundium" (landlordism) still exists in the south. Sometimes it is even worse, the servants are not even peasants, they have become slaves (african immigrants). In the third world, parts of south america, asia and africa peasants are still many.
In Italy people like Forge are called "workers". There is no need to work in a factory to be called "a worker".
Fair enough I have another question but it's too hot to sit here. Maybe later.Funk N. Furter wrote:Not all self employed are middle class. It can get tricky when you start trying to figure out what class a particular individual is in. The concept of classes is there to give you an overview, an analytical tool, not to describe an individual.