I always thought that Intel deserves a real, simple, and stable OS.
![Twisted Evil :twisted:](./images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif)
Ubuntu Linux is just that for most of the computer users I know - ie. those that only browse the web, send email, use IM of any flavour (GAIM kicks the proprietary clients' collective arses anyways), play MP3s, and need light office-type apps. It does all of those out of the box, really, and it's installed without a hitch on the three systems I've used it on (only one was Intel, though, but plenty of people are using it). Plus it's free as in beer and free as in speech. It's teh future, mate.LiveLong wrote:I always thought that Intel deserves a real, simple, and stable OS.
That is because there is competition in the PC market. You know, many manufacturers selling essentially the same product.forge wrote: ...I dont see any of the PC laptop makers constantly pissing about with these stupid games, they just release new laptops when they do...
Can I install Linux on my PC and run Live?noisetonepause wrote:Ubuntu Linux is just that for most of the computer users I know - ie. those that only browse the web, send email, use IM of any flavour (GAIM kicks the proprietary clients' collective arses anyways), play MP3s, and need light office-type apps. It does all of those out of the box, really, and it's installed without a hitch on the three systems I've used it on (only one was Intel, though, but plenty of people are using it). Plus it's free as in beer and free as in speech. It's teh future, mate.LiveLong wrote:I always thought that Intel deserves a real, simple, and stable OS.
LiveLong wrote:Can I install Linux on my PC and run Live?
(no)noisetonepause wrote:Ubuntu Linux is just that for most of the computer users I know - ie. those that only browse the web, send email, use IM of any flavour (GAIM kicks the proprietary clients' collective arses anyways), play MP3s, and need light office-type apps. It does all of those out of the box, really, and it's installed without a hitch on the three systems I've used it on (only one was Intel, though, but plenty of people are using it). Plus it's free as in beer and free as in speech. It's teh future, mate.
Actually, releasing iBooks and iMacs first would make more sense. These users are less dependant upon third-party applications than the PowerBook and Power Mac users/ The third-party apps that the "i" users are dependant upon are also less performance oriented than the Power users, which means that running them through Rosetta won't be as big a hit.DJSK wrote:It would make sense to release a powerbook first. If they were to release an ibook that was intel powered and more powerful and faster than the current powerbooks I would think the sales for powerbooks would come to a dead hault.
I really hope thats not true - what would be the point?? there are enough - Live 5 is enough, they should keep doing what they're good at and make more good FX and instruments, and maybe pour some resources into creating some kind of customer service department, and fix a few bugs!psi wrote:2nd rumour - Native Instruments are working on a new DAW - may keep Ableton on their toes..
well that may be true, but dont you think the powerbooks will be alot cheaper once they're released?dirtystudios wrote: I myself ordered a PowerBook on Friday. My logic being that by the time I need a new machine, the platform will be well supported. It's the same logic I used with the migration to OSX, and it worked well. I switched over when 10.2 came out, and by that time, there were plenty of plug-ins and applications, with all the wrinkles of the new platform ironed out.
k