Amen Break: Copyright?
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 8:53 pm
- Location: Calgary, AB
Amen Break: Copyright?
I'm working on a project and I've considered using the original Amen Break. Is this a copyright no-no, or what's the deal now? I should mention it's for an open source project, through a university, and I don't think royalties are something I'm budgeted for....
Thanks,
PS- Where the F is Live 6?!?!
Thanks,
PS- Where the F is Live 6?!?!
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 8:53 pm
- Location: Calgary, AB
don't worry about it. even the original song is suspect in its copyright...its a mix of two impressions songs (we're a winner and amen brother), and amen itself is based on a traditional (probably public domain) gospel song. hmmm...i have the 45 somewhere, i'll have to dig it up and see what the songwriting credits say.
I've actually been collecting the royalties on the Amen break for the Broken Amen Relief Fund. Please send your contribution to;
Broken Amen Foundation
123 Broadway Ave
Eugene, Oregon
97401
Thank you, and may the drum and bass be with you.
Broken Amen Foundation
123 Broadway Ave
Eugene, Oregon
97401
Thank you, and may the drum and bass be with you.
3ghz Pentium 4 (Prescott), XP Sp2, 1gig Ram, Dual Monitor with Matrox Millenium, MOTU Traveler, Event EZ8 Adat card. Also IBM THinkpad t40 1.6 1 gig ram
-
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 7:15 am
- Location: Portland, OR
- Contact:
Re: Amen Break: Copyright?
Heres my view of it having studied a lot about sampling over the years take it or leave it:
The one of the copyrights is owned by the winstons, and neither the copyright owner of the winstons work or the drummer who played the riff have ever received money for it being used and are pissed off.
The other copyright is owned by the label, and i dont know who that is
so with al samples you need to get:
one permission from the copyright owner of the song -- usually a music publisher. in this case i think its the drummer or another member of the band sax player.
one permission from the copyright owner of the master tapes -- usually a record company
You then need to ask them is it ok to use. If they say ok then its ok. If not then you need tobuy them out otherwise you are not authorised and could get sued.
Or you can run the gauntlet
Or you can wait for the original artis to die and then wait another 50 years.
An alternative to this is to buy royaly free samples where session drummers have rerecorded it themselves which is allowed
Also if you perform it in a live environment i think its ok to do. just not selling it as a musical composition.
Everyone doing this is running the gauntlet
Heres 2 stories, to the best of my knowledge of course:
Lauren Hill from the Fugees got shafted for not getting clearence from my knowledge, for her solo album. dont know the specific details but google it. All the songs on the album were not hers and some of the artists were not dead 50 years so she was not authorised to use the songs.
The Prodigy's Liam Howlett writes the music with the sample and replaces it by then gets a session musician in to rerecord it to get around this issue. Now its not hte original sample. And as its all chopped up in a slightly different order and not the original musician nobody owns the rights except The Prodigy/Liam
Really clever.
The one of the copyrights is owned by the winstons, and neither the copyright owner of the winstons work or the drummer who played the riff have ever received money for it being used and are pissed off.
The other copyright is owned by the label, and i dont know who that is
so with al samples you need to get:
one permission from the copyright owner of the song -- usually a music publisher. in this case i think its the drummer or another member of the band sax player.
one permission from the copyright owner of the master tapes -- usually a record company
You then need to ask them is it ok to use. If they say ok then its ok. If not then you need tobuy them out otherwise you are not authorised and could get sued.
Or you can run the gauntlet
Or you can wait for the original artis to die and then wait another 50 years.
An alternative to this is to buy royaly free samples where session drummers have rerecorded it themselves which is allowed
Also if you perform it in a live environment i think its ok to do. just not selling it as a musical composition.
Everyone doing this is running the gauntlet
Heres 2 stories, to the best of my knowledge of course:
Lauren Hill from the Fugees got shafted for not getting clearence from my knowledge, for her solo album. dont know the specific details but google it. All the songs on the album were not hers and some of the artists were not dead 50 years so she was not authorised to use the songs.
The Prodigy's Liam Howlett writes the music with the sample and replaces it by then gets a session musician in to rerecord it to get around this issue. Now its not hte original sample. And as its all chopped up in a slightly different order and not the original musician nobody owns the rights except The Prodigy/Liam
Really clever.
-
- Posts: 6011
- Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 12:15 pm
Re: Amen Break: Copyright?
It's mine. Give me money.
MacBook Pro 13" Retina i7 2.8 GHz OS 10.13, L10.0.1, M4L.
MacStudio M1Max 32Go OS 12.3.1
MacStudio M1Max 32Go OS 12.3.1
-
- Posts: 4598
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 9:42 am
- Location: Hoerikwaggo's sunset side...
- Contact:
Re: Amen Break: Copyright?
Funk N. Furter wrote:Just use it and pray.
Amen!
Re: Amen Break: Copyright?
Dude! Entire genres of music and entire cultures are based off stealing this sample. I wouldnt worry about it.
Re: Amen Break: Copyright?
Holy fukken necropostacidshell wrote:Heres my view of it having studied a lot about sampling over the years take it or leave it:
The one of the copyrights is owned by the winstons, and neither the copyright owner of the winstons work or the drummer who played the riff have ever received money for it being used and are pissed off.
The other copyright is owned by the label, and i dont know who that is
so with al samples you need to get:
one permission from the copyright owner of the song -- usually a music publisher. in this case i think its the drummer or another member of the band sax player.
one permission from the copyright owner of the master tapes -- usually a record company
You then need to ask them is it ok to use. If they say ok then its ok. If not then you need tobuy them out otherwise you are not authorised and could get sued.
Or you can run the gauntlet
Or you can wait for the original artis to die and then wait another 50 years.
An alternative to this is to buy royaly free samples where session drummers have rerecorded it themselves which is allowed
Also if you perform it in a live environment i think its ok to do. just not selling it as a musical composition.
Everyone doing this is running the gauntlet
Heres 2 stories, to the best of my knowledge of course:
Lauren Hill from the Fugees got shafted for not getting clearence from my knowledge, for her solo album. dont know the specific details but google it. All the songs on the album were not hers and some of the artists were not dead 50 years so she was not authorised to use the songs.
The Prodigy's Liam Howlett writes the music with the sample and replaces it by then gets a session musician in to rerecord it to get around this issue. Now its not hte original sample. And as its all chopped up in a slightly different order and not the original musician nobody owns the rights except The Prodigy/Liam
Really clever.
Re: Amen Break: Copyright?
Use it, and if anyone asks, say you got it from some sample collection haha
A lot of sample/loop collections have been sold with that audio included in them. It has really gone too far to be contained in any rational way.
Unless of course you flat out say 'hey, I sampled the amen break straight from the source', there is no way to say you didn't acquire it elsewhere. In which case you'd get to point a finger and claim ignorance haha
A lot of sample/loop collections have been sold with that audio included in them. It has really gone too far to be contained in any rational way.
Unless of course you flat out say 'hey, I sampled the amen break straight from the source', there is no way to say you didn't acquire it elsewhere. In which case you'd get to point a finger and claim ignorance haha
Re: Amen Break: Copyright?
If you do use the Amen break and the piece you use it in becomes immensely popular and makes a lot of money, depending on who actually owns the right to the break and if they decide to contest copyright and where they take you court, you may one day have to pay up something (or not) ...but if you've made a bucketload of cash whilst using it, then you shouldn't complain then? I don't know. Here's an example from our (Australian music/composers) recent history: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Down_Under ... ht_lawsuit
...and another with a different flavour: http://www.tonedeaf.com.au/news/local-n ... -bonfa.htm
...and another with a different flavour: http://www.tonedeaf.com.au/news/local-n ... -bonfa.htm
“... it was just to make an average listener go: ‘What the fuck is this?’ That’s a real inspiration for me and something that I will explore more on upcoming recordings.”
- Wally De Backer (Gotye) quoting Ween's intention behind making records
Re: Amen Break: Copyright?
If you are using it for a university you might want to be a little careful. Since the university is a business they most likely could be the ones getting sued. Many businesses have a list of songs though they can play at public events. If it is in their you probably could use the song as long as nobody is making any revenue off of it.Silverfish wrote:I'm working on a project and I've considered using the original Amen Break. Is this a copyright no-no, or what's the deal now? I should mention it's for an open source project, through a university, and I don't think royalties are something I'm budgeted for....
Thanks,
PS- Where the F is Live 6?!?!
That said playing a sample like this would probably fall through the cracks.
The main problem is if you or somebody else used your performance and either made a lot of money or got a decent amount of recognition from it.
-
- Posts: 4478
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 4:50 am