Warp to triplet values?

Spiralgroove · Post by **Spiralgroove** » Tue Oct 31, 2006 7:31 pm

Spiralgroove wrote:you can drop your loop in arrange and set the arrange grid on 1/3s
then just be real careful warping the 1/4 markers and watch how its reflected in the arranger...

nobody tried this?

it works...

longjohns · Post by **longjohns** » Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:38 am

longjohns wrote:posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 8:23 am Post subject:

anyway, sometimes i use a combination of viewing the arrangement grid and the clip view for warping. so you could watch the triplet grid above and warp the clip using the straight markers such that the triplets line up above... just an idea

bry2k wrote:Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 12:41 pm Post subject:

Thanks. That's a great idea! I'll definitely try it. I think it emphasizes that in certain scenarios, even you could use the feature I'm talking about.

Spiralgroove wrote:Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:13 pm Post subject:

you can drop your loop in arrange and set the arrange grid on 1/3s
then just be real careful warping the 1/4 markers and watch how its reflected in the arranger...

Spiralgroove wrote:Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 11:31 am Post subject:

Spiralgroove wrote:
you can drop your loop in arrange and set the arrange grid on 1/3s
then just be real careful warping the 1/4 markers and watch how its reflected in the arranger...

nobody tried this?

it works...

seems like you're not even reading the thread...

Spiralgroove · Post by **Spiralgroove** » Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:53 pm

it just seems that way

longjohns · Post by **longjohns** » Wed Nov 01, 2006 4:03 pm

djsynchro · Post by **djsynchro** » Sun Nov 05, 2006 9:36 pm

How's this?

Take a track that's 120 BPM. Set Live's tempo to 240 BPM. Right click on the first warp marker and execute "warp 240 BPM from here"

Now live interprets your file as being 240 BPM, and gives you twice as many warp markers. Like wise, you could tell it the file was 360 BPM now you get three times the amount of warp markers - triplets!

Would that solve it for you?

bry2k · Post by **bry2k** » Sun Nov 05, 2006 10:38 pm

Nope...that solution works out to be way too complicated in the real world. Clips won't preview at the right tempo, everything has to be manually forced to warp at 3x the orig tempo...it's too much of a hassle for a real project where I have dozens of tracks and hundreds of clips.

-Bryan

djsynchro · Post by **djsynchro** » Sun Nov 05, 2006 10:44 pm

Bummer!

dr.wackler · Post by **dr.wackler** » Mon Nov 06, 2006 2:30 am

Not about triplets, but you in later posts you were also talking about finer warp marker resolution in general:

-- Set the tempo of you song to 4 times the tempo would want to work with (e.g. 480 instead of 120)
-- Set the global metrum accordingly if you want the click and the arrange grid to make sense (e.g. 4/1 instead of 4/4)

-- Set the original tempo of your clips to 4 times the original tempo (e.g. 480 instead of 120)
-- Set the metrum of the clips accordingly (e.g. 4/1 instead of 4/4)

---> Now you get warp markers in 1/64 resolution when you zoom in on the clips.

Just a workaround, I know, but maybe it helps for the time being.

EDIT:
Ooops, that's what happens if you don't hit refresh on a thread that you opened 5 hours ago.... didn't see the last 3 posts....

Though: Many (not all) loops will preview correctly, and on dragging in from the browser also be guessed correctly (i.e. in the 120bpm example be taken as 480bpm loops, hence play back at a speed that makes sense).

Warp to triplet values?

Re: Warp to triplet values?