Post
by andydes » Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:39 pm
Nah, we're not from the future, it's just americans that are backward. heh, heh, heh.
Seriously guys, do you think the US government would give advance notice to the BBC after all the effort it would take to do such a thing. Doesn’t sound very clever.
If you’re looking for a conspiracy, surely you’re better off checking out the more tangible evidence, such as:
The very strange actions of the terrorists just before the attacks.
The trail of evidence incriminating Al Qaeda, including the ridiculously incriminating luggage of one of the terrorists that didn’t make the connecting flight to the world trade centre. (flight manuals, suicide bombers handbook, even a bloody will).
The visit by US agents to Bin Laden while he was in hospital shortly beforehand, even though he was even then top of the most wanted list.
The fact that the Taliban had offered to give up Bin Laden to the US.
The omission of the terrorist names on the flight manifests.
The reports of many of the terrorists being found alive and well after the attacks.
The orders to stop FBI investigations into terrorist cells despite the warnings of an impending attack.
There’s plenty more holes in the story that could point to a much less obvious involvement. One that would be easier to implement and to deny.
In my view, if anyone in the government was involved (I’m about 50/50 on it) they’d be much more likely to use a terrorist organisation to do there dirty work than do it themselves.
Look at how they actively encouraged conspiracies linking UFO with aliens to discredit sightings of prototype aircraft such as the U2, B2 & F117. You’d be playing into their hands by going on about building 7 and controlled demolitions, as it makes everyone investigating this look like a bunch of nutters.
btw we're not from the future, it's just that americans are backward. heh, heh, heh.
