Live 7 definitely needs flying plugin windows
Hey k9's sup,
I'm not really that bothered about this feature being added and you can forget about them adding it in Live 7 cause its already been released. Right so it came out today and Scott, Kevin and Sammy bought a copy... so we are probably already at version 7.0.3. Once the Lite version needs M-Audio-ization that will take us to what 7.0.27 ?
See now its Live 8 time, this time it includes a cock enlarger and some lubricunt.
They are corporate cyber-gays, they want to butt rape your bank balance. In return for your shit you'll get another 12 months of their shit.
I'm not gonna buy Live 7 (Sorry I just love the sound of that ...)
Bye
I'm not really that bothered about this feature being added and you can forget about them adding it in Live 7 cause its already been released. Right so it came out today and Scott, Kevin and Sammy bought a copy... so we are probably already at version 7.0.3. Once the Lite version needs M-Audio-ization that will take us to what 7.0.27 ?
See now its Live 8 time, this time it includes a cock enlarger and some lubricunt.
They are corporate cyber-gays, they want to butt rape your bank balance. In return for your shit you'll get another 12 months of their shit.
I'm not gonna buy Live 7 (Sorry I just love the sound of that ...)
Bye
MacBook MacOS Live 9.7.1 Max for Live Push Logic
-
- Posts: 2255
- Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 10:10 pm
well you could always run two instance of live, one with one track with monitor on and a spectrum, and the other instance with your song/work, sending to the spectrum one.roby wrote:well, it seems to me that they should implement something to combat this little annoyance as soon as they can, because not being able to use the spectrum analyzer in such way is a bit half-assed... sort like not being able to turn off a TV unless you pull off the plug from the wall
really? doesn't seem that cpu efficient but i'll try itfriend_kami wrote:well you could always run two instance of live, one with one track with monitor on and a spectrum, and the other instance with your song/work, sending to the spectrum one.roby wrote:well, it seems to me that they should implement something to combat this little annoyance as soon as they can, because not being able to use the spectrum analyzer in such way is a bit half-assed... sort like not being able to turn off a TV unless you pull off the plug from the wall
I think he was being sarcasticroby wrote:really? doesn't seem that cpu efficient but i'll try itfriend_kami wrote:well you could always run two instance of live, one with one track with monitor on and a spectrum, and the other instance with your song/work, sending to the spectrum one.roby wrote:well, it seems to me that they should implement something to combat this little annoyance as soon as they can, because not being able to use the spectrum analyzer in such way is a bit half-assed... sort like not being able to turn off a TV unless you pull off the plug from the wall
Just get this. It's better and free: http://www.voxengo.com/product/SPAN/roby wrote:oh great... cpu death by sarcaaaasm
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 1:06 pm
- Location: Tel-Aviv
- Contact:
+1
Especially on Master or any side-chained channel. Or... any submix that ivolve a couple of interconnected Return channels. Or... there is a plenty of use cases as you might see. In fact, working with physical console always have all the displays available, why not have kinda "lock" option for any ableton window, so that if one "sticks" it - it won't disappear while switching to another track.
Especially on Master or any side-chained channel. Or... any submix that ivolve a couple of interconnected Return channels. Or... there is a plenty of use cases as you might see. In fact, working with physical console always have all the displays available, why not have kinda "lock" option for any ableton window, so that if one "sticks" it - it won't disappear while switching to another track.