Anyone using Apogee Duet?

misteron · Post by **misteron** » Wed Jun 18, 2008 10:02 am

I've heard one report of problems using Duet with more than 2GB RAM (post #21 on this page)

Can anyone confirm / deny?

Has anyone used Duet with Leopard?

joeyfivecents · Post by **joeyfivecents** » Tue Jul 01, 2008 2:24 am

using duet with leopard and the only problems I've had so far is the massive amounts of latency with Live.

joeyfivecents · Post by **joeyfivecents** » Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:15 pm

any news on this?

misteron · Post by **misteron** » Thu Jul 24, 2008 7:46 pm

no news here.
decided on ultralite instead

t1mp · Post by **t1mp** » Thu Jul 24, 2008 8:42 pm

i run it on leopard with 9 ms latency. Thats total. Its a very good card. I am using with 4 gigs of ram.

joeyfivecents · Post by **joeyfivecents** » Fri Jul 25, 2008 2:53 am

i'm also running it with Leopard and 4 gigs of RAM but if I adjust it down past 11ms input latency it crackles and pops like crazy

dysanfel · Post by **dysanfel** » Fri Jul 25, 2008 3:03 am

I use it with 3GB in my MacBook and 4GB in my Hackintosh. Works great. If you want a unit that sounds better than anything else on the market under $1500 buy a Duet.

Tytus · Post by **Tytus** » Fri Jul 25, 2008 5:31 am

t1mp wrote:i run it on leopard with 9 ms latency. Thats total.

after delay compensation?

TheSilent · Post by **TheSilent** » Fri Jul 25, 2008 2:39 pm

misteron wrote:no news here.
decided on ultralite instead

Decided on ultralite mk3 also..

beats me · Post by **beats me** » Fri Jul 25, 2008 2:55 pm

Correct me if I am wrong here, but I heard you can't separate the main outs from the headphone out so it's all or nothing. How stupid…or maybe I am stupid if I'm wrong. It seems a little pricey if all you are getting is just clean sound and low latency on just 2 tracks.

joeyfivecents · Post by **joeyfivecents** » Fri Jul 25, 2008 9:25 pm

there is clean sound but like I keep saying, with Live there is no low latency.

krank · Post by **krank** » Fri Jul 25, 2008 9:35 pm

Tytus wrote:
t1mp wrote:i run it on leopard with 9 ms latency. Thats total.
after delay compensation?

Huh?

Tytus · Post by **Tytus** » Fri Jul 25, 2008 10:05 pm

im asking if he uses delay compensation at all. cause like joey said, theres no low latency with live.

Tarekith · Post by **Tarekith** » Sat Jul 26, 2008 1:55 am

Delay compensation has nothing to do with this... so.... huh?

t1mp · Post by **t1mp** » Sat Jul 26, 2008 2:42 am

krank wrote:
Tytus wrote:
t1mp wrote:i run it on leopard with 9 ms latency. Thats total.
after delay compensation?
Huh?

yes after delay comp