Both ways round would be nice (as the actress said to the bishop)tjwett wrote:i think the other way around actually. i'm guessing Max-ish tools for creating native Ableton devices.crumhorn wrote:Does this mean we'll be able to drop an instance of operator, sampler, saturator or whatever into a Max patch?
Thoughts on Max for Live
"The banjo is the perfect instrument for the antisocial."
(Allow me to plug my guitar scale visualiser thingy - www.fretlearner.com)
(Allow me to plug my guitar scale visualiser thingy - www.fretlearner.com)
i guess i think more of things i can actually here; synths, effects etc. i have plenty of sequencer already. i'm not hating on Max, like i said i know it's powerful and can do wild stuff. i think it would get a lot of use from Live users if it actually looked and acted in a familiar way. this might be just that.Machinate wrote: It takes two to three minutes to build a viable step sequencer in Max.
... aaah , maybe a kind of script editor for Live !? - waaaay to complicated for my taste ...tjwett wrote:i think the other way around actually. i'm guessing Max-ish tools for creating native Ableton devices.crumhorn wrote:Does this mean we'll be able to drop an instance of operator, sampler, saturator or whatever into a Max patch?
yeah it would. but i'm just going off the name we've heard so far - oop, this just in. AKAI publishes another interview, this time with Mr. Robert Henke, where he mentions "Live for Max". godammit, another surprise ruined.crumhorn wrote:Both ways round would be nice (as the actress said to the bishop)tjwett wrote:i think the other way around actually. i'm guessing Max-ish tools for creating native Ableton devices.crumhorn wrote:Does this mean we'll be able to drop an instance of operator, sampler, saturator or whatever into a Max patch?
-
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 3:05 am
Machinate, you find it easy because that is the way your mind works, but it's safe to say that some people will never get their head around it.Machinate wrote:I really don't feel that way - I can understand why people might object to v.4.* which is really old, but v5 makes fantastic little GUIs.emma wrote:the original Max gui is terrible , really (from a musicians point of view) ...
It takes two to three minutes to build a viable step sequencer in Max.not terrifying. just not musical. takes a lot of patching before you have a musically useful device laid out before you.
I'm not saying these people are thick, they might be musical geniuses, just not good at grasping software technology.
"The banjo is the perfect instrument for the antisocial."
(Allow me to plug my guitar scale visualiser thingy - www.fretlearner.com)
(Allow me to plug my guitar scale visualiser thingy - www.fretlearner.com)
yeah shit, you're right. so this could be a MIDI-only affair? i just suddenly got real bored.Machinate wrote:Ah, that would be the "MSP" parttjwett wrote:i guess i think more of things i can actually here; synths, effects etc.Machinate wrote: It takes two to three minutes to build a viable step sequencer in Max.
-
- Posts: 1020
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 9:56 pm
- Location: San Francisco
-
- Posts: 5788
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:05 pm
- Location: Melbourne Australia
- Contact:
System exclusive??? (nah, just kidding)timothyallan wrote:I bet there will be OSC... how else would that new Akai surface get the clip status colors from Live (without using python)
"The banjo is the perfect instrument for the antisocial."
(Allow me to plug my guitar scale visualiser thingy - www.fretlearner.com)
(Allow me to plug my guitar scale visualiser thingy - www.fretlearner.com)