Page 8 of 12
Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 8:00 am
by alvaro
One more time:
External sidechain inputs for compressors and gate.
A new hi end compressor / limiter
Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 10:58 am
by koneko
anyone mentioned -- recording automation on session view
?
this just go be there!!!!!!!
Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 11:15 am
by hoffman2k
Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 11:20 am
by headquest
Pardon?
Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 11:22 am
by alvaro
alvaro wrote:One more time:
External sidechain inputs for compressors and gate.
A new hi end compressor / limiter
YOU Shut the F**K UP
AUTOPAN IS THE CHOOSEN
AUTOPAN
AUTOMAN
MY SPEAKERS ARE BURSTING
WE LOVE YOU AUTOPAN
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 8:23 pm
by aeon
lol wtf
p.s. all i really want is curves
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 10:12 am
by serge_a_storms
hoffman2k wrote:1. A paycheck
2. A medal of honor
3. Support to be replaced by cute girls behind webcams. Teasing us with their bugfixes.
4. Flexible mind mapping. Tell me what to push and when to push it.
5. CAN YOU HEAR ME?
6. An abortion klinik for unfinished projects.
7. I bought Live but I want cubase. Fix this now!!
8. cables Cables CABLES CABLES
Number 7 is very often the case!
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 10:37 am
by headquest
serge_a_storms wrote: Number 7 is very often the case!
Crazy but true.
I think that Ableton have begun to market it as such however (i.e. as a full DAW that provides a complete project solution), so are partly to blame for such mistakes, and certainly magazines like Future Music are listing Live as a Cubase alternative.
Very misleading imho.
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 10:56 am
by robin
headquest wrote:serge_a_storms wrote: Number 7 is very often the case!
Crazy but true.
I think that Ableton have begun to market it as such however (i.e. as a full DAW that provides a complete project solution), so are partly to blame for such mistakes, and certainly magazines like Future Music are listing Live as a Cubase alternative.
Very misleading imho.
Especially when we all know Live is a Traktor alternative.
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 11:23 am
by hoffman2k
robin wrote:headquest wrote:serge_a_storms wrote: Number 7 is very often the case!
Crazy but true.
I think that Ableton have begun to market it as such however (i.e. as a full DAW that provides a complete project solution), so are partly to blame for such mistakes, and certainly magazines like Future Music are listing Live as a Cubase alternative.
Very misleading imho.
Especially when we all know Live is a Traktor alternative.
Live is my alternative to max/msp
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 12:02 pm
by forge
Live is just Live - why does it need to be an alternative to anything?
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 12:41 pm
by headquest
People like to put things in boxes, is all.
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 1:00 pm
by abletoff
To me, Live is just Chaos, creative chaos. It's the only app that can be described and used in that way, it's unique and somewhat is what computers were born for,to make possible things that could not be possible without the existence of a computer.
Thus, it can be improved in infinite ways, but i suspect that ableton, being artists, try each time to reinvent it. Racks are an invention, sampler is an unique tool. So while the main workings of the app undoubely need to get grounded - with some pretty "logic" features, it also claims for visions, which will probably be embodied. So with Live 7 we will find ourselves screaming for more "regular daw features" anyway, while we get some more amazing tools. Chaos, actually. Isn't it what we are all after anyway?
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 1:35 pm
by alvaro
abletoff wrote:To me, Live is just Chaos, creative chaos. It's the only app that can be described and used in that way, it's unique and somewhat is what computers were born for,to make possible things that could not be possible without the existence of a computer.
Thus, it can be improved in infinite ways, but i suspect that ableton, being artists, try each time to reinvent it. Racks are an invention, sampler is an unique tool. So while the main workings of the app undoubely need to get grounded - with some pretty "logic" features, it also claims for visions, which will probably be embodied. So with Live 7 we will find ourselves screaming for more "regular daw features" anyway, while we get some more amazing tools. Chaos, actually. Isn't it what we are all after anyway?
Indeed one of the things i like the most on Ableton is that they allways find an elegant way to offer those popular tools, in a very flexible and unique conception. Live is the most ergonomical, intuitive and looks beatiful, but its very capable too. People complain when Live comes with a sampler, argueing that there are loads of third party VST samplers out there; but personally, i never considered using one until i opened that beatiful and streamlined small window... is so easy and intuitive -i never used any sampler before, and it fits perfect in Live; i would never look for another sampler, whatever more sophisticated than Live's Sampler was. For this reason, if they bring us -lets say- a live vocoder device, i shall be plenty sure which vocoder i am going to use since then, although i already own Orange Vocoder...
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 8:50 pm
by serge_a_storms
I don't think of DAW in terms of specs I just use it (live) as a creative tool.
I'm sureCubase and logic (etc) can do all sorts of things (that live can't) and I'm sure they are great at it. I just like the way live does what it does.
but hey thats just me.