Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 6:03 pm
rithma wrote:IT IS CRUCIAL.
Ableton Forum
Dear Mr. Henke, we are voting now for Looper in Live 8!
Page 8 of 10
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 6:28 pm
just let me map a delete button to delete the last recorded clip and ill be happy!
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 6:49 pm
it would be ideal to have this feature, please.
first recorded loop set Tempo
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:13 pm
Another vote for a Looper in L8
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 10:54 pm
As the OP, I formally withdraw my vote for Looper in Live 8. I would MUCH rather Ableton implement the top 10 workflow/feature requests that should have been in Live 7. 
Looper in Live 9!
Looper in Live 9!
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:01 am
As a person who is not the OP, I formally add to the requests for an Ableton Looper.
1. This IS a workflow enhancement to me.
2. I mean, I don't know, but isn't the software called . . . LIVE?
3. This has needed for awhile OR at least "first loop sets tempo/loop length." I would be happy with that . . .
1. This IS a workflow enhancement to me.
2. I mean, I don't know, but isn't the software called . . . LIVE?
3. This has needed for awhile OR at least "first loop sets tempo/loop length." I would be happy with that . . .
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 7:56 am
You're right I agree. I change back my vote again.
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 2:47 am
In honor of me wasting another week of my life and several hundred more dollars,
this thread gets a BIG FUCKING BUMP.
LOOPER PLEASE
this thread gets a BIG FUCKING BUMP.
LOOPER PLEASE
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 2:52 am
+100dave dominey wrote:just let me map a delete button to delete the last recorded clip and ill be happy!
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 2:59 pm
Another vote for a looper
a la Rc-50
a la Rc-50
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 4:58 pm
yes please.
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 2:25 pm
My vote is for additional clip record/playback functionality to allow looping. This allows the flexibility to vary the tempo of looped material live - this currently dissuades me from using a VST looper in my projects.
I also like the extended follow actions idea - follow actions are currently pretty limited.
And the controls to manipulate material in the current scene, like record/delete/play buttons for tracks that operate on the current playing scene.
However, my approach to looping could be a bit different to most. I don't want to have to decide prior to a loop if I want to record it. I want it to record anyhow, and then I can decide to keep it if I want to near the end. That way, mistakes do not become part of the loop, because you have played it and can decide if it is worth keeping.
In my ideal version of Live, Clips in a Scene would have sub-elements. Some clips would select a random sub-element or iterate through sub-elements, providing variation within a Scene (drum fills or bass riffs). Other clips could record and layer sub-elements, with controls to discard/keep the takes, and the feedback/lifetime. And Scenes would have more controllable follow actions, to give additional flexibility to performance.
Si
I also like the extended follow actions idea - follow actions are currently pretty limited.
And the controls to manipulate material in the current scene, like record/delete/play buttons for tracks that operate on the current playing scene.
However, my approach to looping could be a bit different to most. I don't want to have to decide prior to a loop if I want to record it. I want it to record anyhow, and then I can decide to keep it if I want to near the end. That way, mistakes do not become part of the loop, because you have played it and can decide if it is worth keeping.
In my ideal version of Live, Clips in a Scene would have sub-elements. Some clips would select a random sub-element or iterate through sub-elements, providing variation within a Scene (drum fills or bass riffs). Other clips could record and layer sub-elements, with controls to discard/keep the takes, and the feedback/lifetime. And Scenes would have more controllable follow actions, to give additional flexibility to performance.
Si
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 3:59 pm
This is my preference as well, as opposed to a Looper effect. I think Live could get a LOT of mileage out of having the overdub button apply to the record behavior of both audio and MIDI clips instead of MIDI clips only.sblakely wrote:My vote is for additional clip record/playback functionality to allow looping.
This is generally why many folks prefer looping with an Undo function, and it's not that unusual.However, my approach to looping could be a bit different to most. I don't want to have to decide prior to a loop if I want to record it. I want it to record anyhow, and then I can decide to keep it if I want to near the end. That way, mistakes do not become part of the loop, because you have played it and can decide if it is worth keeping.
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 5:07 pm
better interface , grouping channels , supports duo screens , the base is on the way out , logical is numero uno , live 8 will beat them all in the future I LOVE LIVE!!!! 
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 8:30 pm
+1 on the looper. I initially bought into computer recording after reading about live 5. So I bought me my first computer, and my first software, and expected to be able to do what I had been doing on my jamman for 10 years, but it really just wasn't there. The first loop setting the tempo is essential to looping. It would be the only reason I would upgrade to live 8.. That and track grouping. But only if it will run on my g4 powerbook.................