beatmunga wrote:I'm all ears for your automation workaround, by the way.
Tone Deft wrote:yes, it's a broken feature but that doesn't mean you have to lay on the ground and cry about it. yes I have a set I've worked on for a while that lost its shine, I will go back and redo the automation or revert to an older rev that sounds better.
I'm afraid that no matter how many times I re-read this Tone Deft, it makes little sense. I'm just undecided as to which area it makes less sense in: making music with software, or general semantics.Tone Deft wrote:I already addressed this. I wrote that an old project seems to suffer from this, I'll go back to an older revision or redo the automation.
you might need to read that twice, I wrote that an old project seems to suffer from this, I'll go back to an older revision or redo the automation.
The only meaning that I can glean from your advice appears to be: undo the awful sounding (through no fault of your own) automation and forget about it, or redo it again and hope that the exact same set of variables result in a more favourable outcome.
But you can't really be saying that, can you? A man of your age?
Mind you, you may well be saying that if the highly embarrassing Chopsocky philosophy is anything to go by.
You'll be quoting The Big Lebowski before the night is out, I'll bet...
