Page 9 of 12
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:28 pm
by udp
Is there a limit to the number of chord members? or can I take a stereo concert band recording and explode it? Imagine live middle school concert band recordings could become flawless performances.
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:28 pm
by forge
Angstrom wrote:
pretty much everyone in 19th and 20th century Australian history looks like that
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:33 pm
by hoffman2k
forge wrote:Angstrom wrote:
pretty much everyone in 19th and 20th century Australian history looks like that
I thought they all looked like this:
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:34 pm
by beats me
noisetonepause wrote:beats me wrote:TITBAG wrote:it cant split shit on a dense track, hence the simplistic demo guitar chords demo. you gaylords are jizzing into your speedos over fuck all as usual, now fuck off
Good cop version: Have to agree. I think some people are jumping way ahead of themselves. It's not like it takes a complete produced track and isolates a single instrument and than breaks that down into individual notes. So nobody is going to be revamping hendrix or pink floyd songs with this thing.
A string quartet might give good results, though..
But I'd like to see what it can do with instruments or sounds that aren't plucked or hammered. Can it seperate vocal harmonies? I think it has it's limitations.
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:53 pm
by siddhu
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 5:17 pm
by nebulae
Angstrom wrote:
Still a sexy bitch, even with all that muff on his face, don't you think?
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 6:02 pm
by noisetonepause
udp wrote:Is there a limit to the number of chord members? or can I take a stereo concert band recording and explode it? Imagine live middle school concert band recordings could become flawless performances.
No.. It can't separate one instrument from another instrument. Just notes of a chord.
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 6:32 pm
by sweetjesus
I laughed when i read this comment on another board which had a post to this:
"That guy they were interviewing seemed pretty cool. I love it when homeless people make up their own languages."
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 7:59 pm
by LOFA
sweetjesus wrote:I laughed when i read this comment on another board which had a post to this:
"That guy they were interviewing seemed pretty cool. I love it when homeless people make up their own languages."
Thank you so much for sharing that...lol
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 4:39 am
by Anubis
The only drawback to this is that if Celemony makes too much money then the bearded dude will shave and get his teeth bleached and thus lose his innovative powers.
Hippies rule!
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 5:28 am
by mohler
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 6:54 am
by kramerica
Karl Marx makes some sweet software.
::furiously masturbates::
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 11:05 am
by Angstrom
audio gandalf wrote:and let's just change it in realtime using this wireless keyboard
the most amazing part ...
12:00 , he opens a Chet Baker song and starts tweaking the trumpet notes separately from the backing track guitar and bass.
as he says ... it can be used on whole mixes (with varying success of course)
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 11:07 am
by Zerobae
peter neubäcker seems like an incredibly nice guy (apart from being a genius)
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:07 pm
by forge
it defintely feels like this is some kind of holy grail, watershed moment - I still cant believe he's cracked it - it seemed like one of those time travel type impossible things
