Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:01 pm
geez, dude, do you know me AT ALL?!?!?sparklepuff wrote:I'm gonna go out on a limb and say you do.nebulae wrote: who wants to bone uhura?
hubba hubba....

geez, dude, do you know me AT ALL?!?!?sparklepuff wrote:I'm gonna go out on a limb and say you do.nebulae wrote: who wants to bone uhura?

We can top and tail..sparklepuff wrote:I'm gonna go out on a limb and say you do.nebulae wrote: who wants to bone uhura?
Do you supposed she paid for the dress.pixelbox wrote:Wynona Rider as Spock's mom = FAIL
Homebelly wrote:We can top and tail..
She's got a might purdy mouth ed'
Okay..
That was not needed and not necessary..
Never! But hopefully it will be close.nebulae wrote:I think it's gonna be cooler than Wrath of Khan
Yeah, I know what you mean. That and shaky camera in films. It can really add to the action, but I hate it when it's so fake (the director has obviously said to his cameraman... "that's not shaky enough! 500% more shake in this scene!"). It's just done to death now and makes me nauseous.blaugruen7 wrote:could anybody cut these actionfilms a bit faster, please?
man, they are only 10 scenes a second. i get endless bored.
why waste that space, i am guessing the cinema film format
comes at least with 25frames a second, so just
fill this just up with cuts of different scenes.
COME ON, MAN.
i am so hollow inside me and i am so very much disconnected from myself,
is it so hard to see that i will just stay in a constant state of epilepsy?
fuck.
now back to my place in front of my stroboscope
yeah man - Simon Pegg has probably gone mad or attained nirvana over that one - he's the supreme film geek and it's probably the role he was born to playrozling wrote:Simon Pegg as Scotty could possibly be utter greatness, but I'm afraid so far this looks like - and I've said this before - James Bond Jr. for Star Trek.
Though that's not entirely a bad thing, James Bond Jr. was great for killing some time.
Disgustng tripe... not believable and not even in the same reality as all that has gone before... this is a failure before it is born. I will not pay a cent to see it.
- T. Kirk James, Federation Village, 19/11/2008 12:28
I too think the new Bond movie could have done with about 50% less shake. Very hard to follow at times.blaugruen7 wrote:yes, shaky camera. this appears as a new trend in action films to me.
yesterday i was in the Bond movie.
it just was too much. it doesnt help i think.
next time i am filming a major hollywood blockbuster i will have to talk to the camera man.