Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:34 pm
- editor for Casio CZ5000, Waldorf MicroQ & Pulse
- a video sample player for visuals triggered via LAN
- a video sample player for visuals triggered via LAN
yes..cheking out the sxformat and sysexin objects now!julienb wrote:hdrpbx wrote:hopefully, if it will be possibile to send/recieve midisysex to/from external devices, an editor for my emu 5000-ultra sampler
dont know how much time it will take me toh, i just donwloaded the max 5 demo and i'm still at the print "hello world" phase of the tutorials , lol
max manages sysex with no problem!
and max for live = max/msp/jitter + live object... so
I am perfectly fine with people stealing my stuff, music or otherwise. However, I myself am not going to just hand out a year's worth of work for free. I'll let the pirates pirate and anyone else who feels they can spare a measly 10 bucks give me the 10 bucks. Its not that big of a financial commitment to really warrant vast amounts of piracy. I pirated Live because I have no income so spending $500 bucks on something that was available for free wasn't really an option for me. Again, I fully intend to buy the suite this time around because I can probably do some accounting trickery and I think they deserve it anyway. If people feel the same about my stuff then great, but I'm not going to be pissed off or judge people for stealing it.Low Frequency Obstinator wrote:From a previous thread I undestood that you use a pirated copy of live?Geezus wrote:I got a long way to go before I learn enough to apply the idea. And yes I will be sharing, but if I put in a bunch of time on it and it works really well I'll prolly charge like 10 bux for it.3rdordertrauma wrote: And I hope you do!! And I hope you share! Actually I would be happy with just the multi-point envelopes part of it.
Myself... well I'll be learning max first... I'm sure that will absorb a good chunk of time.
Hope the devices you create and sell for 10 bux don't suffer from being created on cracked software.
Just a thought.
I'm not looking for a fucking career, I'm looking to create a device *I* want to use and if people want to chip in 10 bucks to use it too, great. That's just bonus sushi money.Low Frequency Obstinator wrote:Nice one Geez,
If they're well made devices and sell like hot cakes you will have an proper income.......... and also have an idea of what its like NOT to have an income at the same time. Its that kind of mind-set that can launch a carreer big time...![]()
The downside is all the damn tax you have to pay and fact that your hobby is now your profession and feels like work rather than fun.....
Best of luck for 09.
a bit double standards dont you think..?Geezus wrote:I am perfectly fine with people stealing my stuff, music or otherwise. However, I myself am not going to just hand out a year's worth of work for free. I'll let the pirates pirate and anyone else who feels they can spare a measly 10 bucks give me the 10 bucks. Its not that big of a financial commitment to really warrant vast amounts of piracy. I pirated Live because I have no income so spending $500 bucks on something that was available for free wasn't really an option for me. Again, I fully intend to buy the suite this time around because I can probably do some accounting trickery and I think they deserve it anyway. If people feel the same about my stuff then great, but I'm not going to be pissed off or judge people for stealing it.Low Frequency Obstinator wrote:From a previous thread I undestood that you use a pirated copy of live?Geezus wrote: I got a long way to go before I learn enough to apply the idea. And yes I will be sharing, but if I put in a bunch of time on it and it works really well I'll prolly charge like 10 bux for it.
Hope the devices you create and sell for 10 bux don't suffer from being created on cracked software.
Just a thought.
a) I already paid for MAX and I intend to pay for ableton suite and M4L so I wont be designing the device on any pirated software, so that point is moot. I have never charged a nickle for anything I ever created on pirated software.Poster wrote: a bit double standards dont you think..?
stealing but not willing to share.. hmmm..
great attitude to contribute to collective efforts..
julienb wrote:Personnaly, I'll try to clone impulse in order to get mute / solo control via midi !!!
I'd like to use it because of the coherence of rythm pattern: all in one clip, etc