Re: Reggae Guitar
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 10:24 pm
I guess this thread can now RIP 
whatever Lyn Taitt, Hux Brown, Ernest Ranglin and guys like that used - Lyn Taitt played on tons of Treasure Isle records with some weird hollow body guitar (you can see him in "The Harder They Come" portions that were shot in Dynamic Studios), and of course for rocksteady, Treasure Isle and Studio One studios recorded many of the classics. Eric Frater definitely played a Rickenbacker at Studio One, i would guess that the amps at either TI or Studio One would have been little Vox amps, or Fender, or whatever combo amp was aroundevon wrote:OK Guys..this is me here..I will forgive you because I guess you might not have known, but I am Rock Steady/Reggae music.
Also thanks for replying, but I guessed you misunderstood. I want some kind of virtual Amp (didnt find it in Guitar Rig)that can emulate that sharp cutting strum and not instructions on how to play a Reggae Rythm, because I am that rythm. I walk, breathe and think in Reggae.

Gods o' reggae guitar. Blip!blakbeltjonez wrote:
Lyn Taitt, Hux Brown, Ernest Ranglin
So very true. There is a sorry lack of documentation. I keep hoping that someone will turn up a massive amount of photos & info so that we can finally learn more about how these sounds were made. Plus I really want to see these fabulous musicians at work.blakbeltjonez wrote:that's kinda off the top of my head, there's really not much info out there about who used what. there's not many pictures or footage of the inside of places like Studio One, Randy's, Channel One, Dynamic, etc. and even less of Treasure Isle. it sure would be great if more interviewers would talk more specifically about the technical aspects with the older players before they all pass away.


+1 - I'd say even moreaisling wrote: Also strumming technique is 50% of the effect.....
In addition to the tools already suggested try using:evon wrote:..I want some kind of virtual Amp (didnt find it in Guitar Rig)that can emulate that sharp cutting strum
The BEST sounds from Guitar Rig are the quieter clean or just lightly overdriven sounds, the heavily distorted ones don't hold up in the mix and require a lot of work to stop turning to mush. I think both products (IK and NI) are good but they just emulate different gear, I really like GR and definately for off the wall heavily modulated sounds it is cool, but nothing will ever sound as good as micing up a real amp. The new GR4 has some good features with the control room and the new WHite amp which sounds especially good on cleaner/lightly driven sounds, although it has a presence about it which is probably not suited - like other posters said, a lot of the early reggae stuff used cheap end gear like H/H and WEM amps with Watkins Copicat echo, rather than expensive tube amps and the super expensive Roland Space Echo units.Check out the demo of Amplitube Fender. Great spring reverbs and much better for clean or moderately distorted sounds than Guitar Rig IMHO. You probably won't find a preset that does what you want, but if you mess around a bit (and don't miss the Ambience parameter to get that roomy sound and do try different mics!) I think you can get somewhere.
that's true to a point - while most of the players and singers might not have been all that interested in what was behind the glass, the studio owners and engineers most certainly were. in most studios, the gear was good although minimal. Dynamic Studios had a custom built MCI console and tape machines (which were later sold to Tubby's - Treasure Isle got one of the 4 track decks). Harry J's had a Helios console, Channel One had an API console, and Federal had a Neve console....aisling wrote:The irony is that once we get so technologically empirical with all this...it is no longer reggeaI always thought reggae had an in the moment "feel" aspect to it. Almost a metaphysical connection to the "moment"....if you want to get all Jah about it.....
I can't imagine bob, or scratch, or any of the greats, being so technological about the production. These guys were pretty simple people, add the drugs and booze on top....
I sort of agree here, but things can be done to get closer. The main issue I have is just how noisy emulations are compared to using a real amp, even hardware stuff like PODs, so high gain stuff often becomes useless.blakbeltjonez wrote:in most of those old recordings, you hear a lot of the room it was recorded in as well since they all played at the same time. even a little amp with a crap mic will do wonders, experiment with mic distance. to be honest, i am not too terribly enthused about amp simulations..... they don't sound right for any guitar IMHO.
blakbeltjonez wrote:that's true to a point - while most of the players and singers might not have been all that interested in what was behind the glass, the studio owners and engineers most certainly were. in most studios, the gear was good although minimal. Dynamic Studios had a custom built MCI console and tape machines (which were later sold to Tubby's - Treasure Isle got one of the 4 track decks). Harry J's had a Helios console, Channel One had an API console, and Federal had a Neve console....aisling wrote:The irony is that once we get so technologically empirical with all this...it is no longer reggeaI always thought reggae had an in the moment "feel" aspect to it. Almost a metaphysical connection to the "moment"....if you want to get all Jah about it.....
I can't imagine bob, or scratch, or any of the greats, being so technological about the production. These guys were pretty simple people, add the drugs and booze on top....
90+ percent of it is really the musicians and the interaction of their playing. songs were usually cut very quickly, normally in one or two takes (Studio One and Treasure Isle in-house productions didn't have that kind of pressure, and certainly Lee Perry's Black Ark didn't) because time was money, and renting studio time was expensive. the expectations for musicians were quite high, if you couldn't run a new tune down in 5 minutes or so odds are you wouldn't work much. producer Bunny Lee wouldn't even bother with a playback to see if things were okay.... the reel was changed, and onto the next tune.
and while much has been made about the spirituality, etc. of it all, for most it was a way to eke out a living - if you could nail down someone to get paid. up until the early 70's, there were only a handful of studios - sessions ran around the clock, and you would be lucky if you could get in if you weren't an A-team or B-team session player, singer or producer.
if you listen to a lot of rocksteady and reggae, it's pretty easy to tell where a song was done.... each studio had it's own distinctive sound and the competition was intense. Randy's Studio was the favorite of both Marley and Lee Perry (from about 1969 - 1972), so much so that when the Chins changed the console to be able to compete with the other multitrack studios, Perry became enraged and set about building his Black Ark studio in his back yard.