Re: Latest copyright nonsense
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 7:46 am
As I thought. The flute is similar. Victory for the underdog though? Bullshit, indeed.
Yes, couldn't help noticing that particular bit of hypocrassy myself.smutek wrote:And to top it off, the Lawyer for Larkin Music touted the ruling as "a victory for the underdog".am wrote: The whole thing is dodgy... this company "larikin music' apparently bought the rights, then sat on them for 15 years until someone on a music quiz TV show pointed out that the melodies were similar.
They then sue these guys who worked hard for years to get onto the world stage and get into a position where they could release a song that could become popular.