Re: At the risk of being controversial...
Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 4:17 pm
Mike, you just killed this thread.

I couldn't agree more. I find reading endless posts about technicalities as dry as sandpapering my eyes. I want to know what people are writing their songs about and why! Anybody?mikemc wrote:Then there is a needless seriousness to all of it, also. Few seem to have a sense of humor about what they are doing.
oh dewd... damn!ChiDJ wrote:Mike, you just killed this thread.
Relax, I'm not here for an argument. I also play keyboards for an indie band and it occurs to me whenever ourselves and others perform, "What exactly are we trying to communicate here?" Is there any thought given to the lyrics, to the construction of the sound, is it ever anything more than just a collection of ad hoc instrumentation?davepermen wrote:looks like you just lost your ability to listen to music just for the enjoyment of the actual music. no, instead you listen to it and think "that's just for hip marketing to sell millions and then drop the artist again and all".
so the only one who actually is too serious about all of it is YOU not being able to just enjoy it.
you're posting in a forum and are not there for an argument? what are you in here for, then?Starkravingdead wrote:Relax, I'm not here for an argument. I also play keyboards for an indie band and it occurs to me whenever ourselves and others perform, "What exactly are we trying to communicate here?" Is there any thought given to the lyrics, to the construction of the sound, is it ever anything more than just a collection of ad hoc instrumentation?davepermen wrote:looks like you just lost your ability to listen to music just for the enjoyment of the actual music. no, instead you listen to it and think "that's just for hip marketing to sell millions and then drop the artist again and all".
so the only one who actually is too serious about all of it is YOU not being able to just enjoy it.
I'd like to hear more of an attempt by musicians to build their sounds on top of palpable ideas, whether they are serious or not. All the talent and technical ability in the world cannot make-up for having nothing to say. Its the Joy Division effect: technically awful yet full of expression.
beats me wrote:Finally a post in The Lounge with some teeth, but I see a lot of people are still equalizing from the "yay, a playground!" mentality this forum was born from. Guilty myself.
I would pose a little self analysis of everybody on this forum's music crafts time. How much time do you spend playing away on the keyboard, guitar, bass, or drums in comparison to diddling around with virtual knobs, faders, and clip launches. We reached the point where "writing" music is 95% parameter lane automation. And that shit just isn't from the soul, man.
dude...not too long ago playing electronic music was waiting for samples to load via scsi and tediously mapping samples to keyzones on tiny screens. have you ever tried renaming sounds on a akai s-3000?.. sucks(i couldnt count how many "untitled xx" sounds i had on any program)...just saying that it was the same shit different pile back then for getting lost in technical stuff...as for the op goes there was the same amount of what he calls crap music back in the day, you just didnt have the convenience of the internet to casually preview tracks while watching porn, msning your freinds and playing poker in your pajamas. personally i like it. nobody really is trying to ram it in your face. in fact it makes it easier to find what you are looking for.beats me wrote:Finally a post in The Lounge with some teeth, but I see a lot of people are still equalizing from the "yay, a playground!" mentality this forum was born from. Guilty myself.
I would pose a little self analysis of everybody on this forum's music crafts time. How much time do you spend playing away on the keyboard, guitar, bass, or drums in comparison to diddling around with virtual knobs, faders, and clip launches. We reached the point where "writing" music is 95% parameter lane automation. And that shit just isn't from the soul, man.
One of my first keyboards was a new at the time Korg DSS-1 sampler, $1,500 for 16 seconds total of stereo samples that you had to save to and load from multiple floppies. So I'm well aware of the good 'ol days. But with those limitations I spent more time working on song structure and composition than micro automating parameters on the same 8 bar loop for days on end. The music had more feeling to it because that is what I could focus on given the limitations.arctic ranger wrote:dude...not too long ago playing electronic music was waiting for samples to load via scsi and tediously mapping samples to keyzones on tiny screens. have you ever tried renaming sounds on a akai s-3000?.. sucks(i couldnt count how many "untitled xx" sounds i had on any program)...just saying that it was the same shit different pile back then for getting lost in technical stuff...as for the op goes there was the same amount of what he calls crap music back in the day, you just didnt have the convenience of the internet to casually preview tracks while watching porn, msning your freinds and playing poker in your pajamas. personally i like it. nobody really is trying to ram it in your face. in fact it makes it easier to find what you are looking for.beats me wrote:Finally a post in The Lounge with some teeth, but I see a lot of people are still equalizing from the "yay, a playground!" mentality this forum was born from. Guilty myself.
I would pose a little self analysis of everybody on this forum's music crafts time. How much time do you spend playing away on the keyboard, guitar, bass, or drums in comparison to diddling around with virtual knobs, faders, and clip launches. We reached the point where "writing" music is 95% parameter lane automation. And that shit just isn't from the soul, man.