Utility plugs on each channel or buses only?
Re: Utility plugs on each channel or buses only?
with a custom utility it can go even better ....
make more than 1 chain to make different automations...
then a/b and choose the best one!!
and store the others for later use in-case you change your mind
make more than 1 chain to make different automations...
then a/b and choose the best one!!
and store the others for later use in-case you change your mind
Re: Utility plugs on each channel or buses only?
Thats how I do it too. I make my own Channel Strip Racks. Put them in the Template, or just drag and drop from the browser. I name them with a version number, so I don't mix up new and old versions.IP wrote:something like this maybe
And yeah, for the lazy ones, just lower the master!
-
muthafunka
- Posts: 2251
- Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2003 5:28 pm
- Location: Tokyo
Re: Utility plugs on each channel or buses only?
Some great info there, thanks, hadn't realised that Util plugs didn't go to -inf, that FreeG looks hot too, ta.
About lowering the master, that's exactly what I don't want to do, I'd rather avoid bottle-necking the master bus and make sure that the total levels coming in are at a usable level. Recall reading about this here and elsewhere, unless any of you audio uber-brains want to chime in?
About lowering the master, that's exactly what I don't want to do, I'd rather avoid bottle-necking the master bus and make sure that the total levels coming in are at a usable level. Recall reading about this here and elsewhere, unless any of you audio uber-brains want to chime in?
Re: Utility plugs on each channel or buses only?
I use Track Groups to coalesce similar sounds amongst themselves then I mix the groups together. first drums because they tend to dominate the mix, then bass, then melodic instruments, then vox.
IMO it's a better situation to be in to have to turn things down than turn them up.
good info in this thread. you can also put a Utility after a Utility to get -70dB, -105dB etc drops in volume. it is strange they stopped at -35dB. that's pretty damn quiet but still...
my $0.01.
edit - so my vote is to not do it on each channel, do it on groups of channels whether that's Sends or Track Groups.
IMO it's a better situation to be in to have to turn things down than turn them up.
good info in this thread. you can also put a Utility after a Utility to get -70dB, -105dB etc drops in volume. it is strange they stopped at -35dB. that's pretty damn quiet but still...
my $0.01.
edit - so my vote is to not do it on each channel, do it on groups of channels whether that's Sends or Track Groups.
In my life
Why do I smile
At people who I'd much rather kick in the eye?
-Moz
Why do I smile
At people who I'd much rather kick in the eye?
-Moz
-
muthafunka
- Posts: 2251
- Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2003 5:28 pm
- Location: Tokyo
Re: Utility plugs on each channel or buses only?
Thanks Tone, think I will just put Utils on buses, then if I have time on all tracks and compare the 2
-
oblique strategies
- Posts: 3606
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 9:57 pm
- Location: Another Green World
Re: Utility plugs on each channel or buses only?
Good one. I hate that Live's Utility won't attenuate to 0db.elxicano wrote:at IP... I forgot all about the volume limitation. I actually experienced that problem not too long ago when I tried to use it to fade out!
Anyway, one other freeware solution (not that the rack wouldn't do the trick) is the Sonalksis FreeG! http://www.sonalksis.com/index.php?section_id=99
-
90's child
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 4:13 pm
Re: Utility plugs on each channel or buses only?
Love this plug for comparing RMS levels of my kick and snare break/2-step patterns.elxicano wrote:at IP... I forgot all about the volume limitation. I actually experienced that problem not too long ago when I tried to use it to fade out!
Anyway, one other freeware solution (not that the rack wouldn't do the trick) is the Sonalksis FreeG! http://www.sonalksis.com/index.php?section_id=99
Re: Utility plugs on each channel or buses only?
FreeG is a great utility alternative and a nice way to view at peak/rms values between devices!
(just drag n drop it and see what is happening before/after any plugin)
.... when it comes to cpu freeG may be still lightweight but
1x freeg = 2x audio effect racks + 2x live utility [Without automation]
1x freeg = 3x audio effect racks + 3x live utility [With automation used]
OR for volume automation only (even an empty rack is enough)
1x freeg = 5x audio effect racks [Without automation]
1x freeg = 7x audio effect racks [With automation used]
Anyway currently im using always and to every channel
1. The free brainworx cleansweep as the first part of my chain for very very clean low/hi cuts
(Cleanest low cut technique/plug-ins - Disq @ gearslutz)
2. A racked utility as the last part of my chain just for the vol/pan automation. (actually i could strip it down to an empty rack but sometimes i need the "width" and dc tools)
So i always have my faders clean of automation and shit .... just for mix.
(just drag n drop it and see what is happening before/after any plugin)
.... when it comes to cpu freeG may be still lightweight but
1x freeg = 2x audio effect racks + 2x live utility [Without automation]
1x freeg = 3x audio effect racks + 3x live utility [With automation used]
OR for volume automation only (even an empty rack is enough)
1x freeg = 5x audio effect racks [Without automation]
1x freeg = 7x audio effect racks [With automation used]
Anyway currently im using always and to every channel
1. The free brainworx cleansweep as the first part of my chain for very very clean low/hi cuts
(Cleanest low cut technique/plug-ins - Disq @ gearslutz)
2. A racked utility as the last part of my chain just for the vol/pan automation. (actually i could strip it down to an empty rack but sometimes i need the "width" and dc tools)
So i always have my faders clean of automation and shit .... just for mix.

