Black + Black = White
-
q.musgrove
- Posts: 397
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 6:32 am
- Location: Seattle
-
dhilsabeck
- Posts: 5935
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 1:52 am
- Location: Chicago
Re: Black + Black = White
its just a recessive gene isnt it? normally the dominant gene displays the trait (skin colour in this case) but occasionally chance allows the recessive gene to display its characteristic
thats what i can remember off the top of my head anyway, we did it in school ages ago
thats what i can remember off the top of my head anyway, we did it in school ages ago
Re: Black + Black = White
lol! no offense, but that's the first time I didn't think "what a fag" after reading that. No offense to gays either.djsynchro wrote:IT JUST WORKS!
http://www.soundcloud.com/v0insCool Character wrote:Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
http://www.facebook.com/v0ins
-
funky shit
- Posts: 3977
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 9:50 pm
- Location: Earth
Re: Black + Black = White
would you shag her?q.musgrove wrote:why did no one talk about paternity testing?
-
q.musgrove
- Posts: 397
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 6:32 am
- Location: Seattle
Re: Black + Black = White
i'll take that popcorn now. thanks.
LoopStationZebra wrote:it's like a hipster commie pinko manifesto. Rambling. Angry. Nearly divorced from all reality; yet strangely compelling with a ring of truth.
Re: Black + Black = White
for a guy who's had puss seeping out of his urethra lately, funky sure is fussy
Pasha wrote:Thanks dum for being so precise.
-
funky shit
- Posts: 3977
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 9:50 pm
- Location: Earth
-
plantaginate
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 2:08 am
Re: Black + Black = White
with all due respect it's not "just anything"slatepipe wrote:its just a recessive gene isnt it? normally the dominant gene displays the trait (skin colour in this case) but occasionally chance allows the recessive gene to display its characteristic
thats what i can remember off the top of my head anyway, we did it in school ages ago
this is what i'm trying to say.
this is a genetic anomaly.
i want everyone to see the evolution in place here
dominant genes take over, take blue eyes for example, recessive gene is the eye of blue
two black parents and one white baby, the baby isn't albino
there is a fantastic mind here
god is looking how?
you cant look past his
-
plantaginate
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 2:08 am
Re: Black + Black = White
who said that?
no god apprehends this situation
no god apprehends this situation
-
q.musgrove
- Posts: 397
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 6:32 am
- Location: Seattle
Re: Black + Black = White
Paternity test first... Claims of the miraculous second 
Re: Black + Black = White
One would assume the genetic experts at Oxford would have confirmed paternity before ranting & raving about the extraordinary nature of this birth.q.musgrove wrote:Paternity test first... Claims of the miraculous second
A kooky assumption ?
Pasha wrote:Thanks dum for being so precise.
-
q.musgrove
- Posts: 397
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 6:32 am
- Location: Seattle
Re: Black + Black = White
Assumption vs. fact.
But if you want to go for hypothetical theories-and saying "extraordinary" is a far cry from a rant-is any scientist going to tell a dude that his wife is probably cheating? Did the father openly refuse a paternity test before taking the claim to a scientist?... we don't know
Ben (the father) also stressed: "My wife is true to me. Even if she hadn't been, the baby still wouldn't look like that.
that's as much as you are told. so you can assume. I'll need a little more proof please.
But if you want to go for hypothetical theories-and saying "extraordinary" is a far cry from a rant-is any scientist going to tell a dude that his wife is probably cheating? Did the father openly refuse a paternity test before taking the claim to a scientist?... we don't know
Ben (the father) also stressed: "My wife is true to me. Even if she hadn't been, the baby still wouldn't look like that.
that's as much as you are told. so you can assume. I'll need a little more proof please.
