Doh! Missed that! Now I look like a twat (as ever).crumhorn wrote:Please don't say "get a mac". I'm on a limited budget and need to get the most form my existing set up.
[facepalm]
Doh! Missed that! Now I look like a twat (as ever).crumhorn wrote:Please don't say "get a mac". I'm on a limited budget and need to get the most form my existing set up.
Well you didn't really say "get a mac" and I enjoyed your post anywayPiplodocus wrote:Doh! Missed that! Now I look like a twat (as ever).crumhorn wrote:Please don't say "get a mac". I'm on a limited budget and need to get the most form my existing set up.
[facepalm]

Your data is old by several years. Slashdot may not represent actual performance testing.Khazul wrote:Ah - that's why semantec is such a hog that it's more trouble than the malware it's supposed to protect you from?

What do you recommend, then?Be careful of products that have no performance impact but are free or close to it. Likely the reason it stays out of your way is because it's completely worthless. In order to make a performant AV product you need a fundamentally different type of technology than any of the vendors mentioned in this thread are using right now.
tempus3r wrote:I work for the world largest AntiVirus company so i'm biased of course it also means i live this stuff every day and have data to back up my opinions.
Note that every product you've discussed in this thread is basically 2001 technology. Microsoft, ESET, AVG are all outdated products whos primary detection capability require a signature that maps to a specific variant of a virus. Because over 90% of malware changes every few times it propagates, these products are next to useless. They only protect you against known variants which is almost never what you'll actually run into.
The perception that AV products are "working fine with no problems" is problematic in that with anti-malware programs, if you notice nothing by letting it run, how do you know it's doing anything? If you have 100 infections on your system, and every password you type is sent to the russian mob is it "working fine with no problems" because it doesn't slow your music machine down?
Be careful of products that have no performance impact but are free or close to it. Likely the reason it stays out of your way is because it's completely worthless. In order to make a performant AV product you need a fundamentally different type of technology than any of the vendors mentioned in this thread are using right now.
Problem with AVG is it's very resistant to being shut down by a script.Moody wrote:I prefer to run a script that shuts down networking and anti-virus along with other unnecessary services while musicing.
This statement establishes that you have no credibility in this discussion. Did you really just say "who better to protect you against OS vulnerabilities are the people who made them in the first place"? lolMcQ714 wrote: this is the type of bullshit that i would expect to hear from the "world largest antivirus company".
there is no way in hell that an antivirus software should be heavy on a CPU.... it should only have to monitor known definciencies in the OS. that's it!!! and who actually knows of those definciencies better than the OS developer themselves???
It's not just Symantec and McAfee who will warn about what is going on these days. Microsoft and everyone else does too. These are just basic facts can't argue with. Let me know if you'd like a reading list.McQ714 wrote: and if you say you work for Norton, i'll tell you that you are full of shit. scare tactics are exactly the type of crap i'd expect to hear from a company like norton or mcafee.
For machines without internet access, people will end up using USB drives to move software they download to them. You will not be able to run a music machine without downloading software for it. If you choose to keep the machine off the internet, you'll be putting that software on it via USB. USB is the modern floppy drive, and a very common attack vector for malware. Google for threats like "Stuxnet" that infected machines in isolated networks in power plants WITH NO INTERNET CONNECTION.McQ714 wrote: so not to knock the "world largest antivirus company" more than it already knocks itself, but the best way to keep viruses off your computer is to not access the internet at all. otherwise only access the sites that you absolutely have to and keep a small footprint AV software on your machine.

Hi OP. You have two options.crumhorn wrote:I'm on the look out for new, preferably free, anti virus software after spending a few hours working out that AVG is behind most of my performance problems with Live.
I'm thinking of trying AVAST. Anybody tried it?
Any other suggestions
Please don't say "get a mac". I'm on a limited budget and need to get the most form my existing set up.
