For sure dude, that too. I would be more likely to work at 88.2 instead of 96, considering that I could resample down to 44.1 with less problems.forge wrote:what about studio mastering to CD?montrealbreaks wrote: For what it's worth, I still work at 44.1 KHz just cause it's easier on the CPU and it sounds good enough for Live work.
96k 24 bit????????
-
montrealbreaks
- Posts: 995
- Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 11:38 pm
- Location: Montreal Canada
I have changed my username; Now posting as:
M. Bréqs