Re: PC USERS: What DAW are you using in addition to Live?
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 12:22 am


If you're recording live instruments, then I would certainly upgrade to X3; the new/improved comping feature is worth the upgrade alone. Otherwise, not so much, IMOkb420 wrote:I kept Sonar 8 PE on my old PC just in case I wanted to work in a more traditional DAW. I've been thinking about upgrading to X3, but I thought I would try something different this time. I'm just looking for some alternatives. What are you guys using and why?
[Please don't say Bitwig. There's enough Bitwig threads on this forum as it is.]
Wow! Do you mean to say that's the case even though I am coming from version 8 PE?Buleriachk wrote:If you're recording live instruments, then I would certainly upgrade to X3; the new/improved comping feature is worth the upgrade alone. Otherwise, not so much, IMOkb420 wrote:I kept Sonar 8 PE on my old PC just in case I wanted to work in a more traditional DAW. I've been thinking about upgrading to X3, but I thought I would try something different this time. I'm just looking for some alternatives. What are you guys using and why?
[Please don't say Bitwig. There's enough Bitwig threads on this forum as it is.]
It really depends on what you want to do. IMO, Sonar's forte is live music processing and production; other DAW's have other emphases.... Sonar X3 is a HUGE upgrade from 8 in many ways, but if you're just doing audio recording and editing (basically), then 8 was pretty good.kb420 wrote:Wow! Do you mean to say that's the case even though I am coming from version 8 PE?Buleriachk wrote: If you're recording live instruments, then I would certainly upgrade to X3; the new/improved comping feature is worth the upgrade alone. Otherwise, not so much, IMO
feindbild wrote:currently none.
although i'm thinking about changing that, that's why i ended up in this thread.
recently i seem to spend more time trying to get everything to sync properly than actually making music.
if i can solve that issue i'll gladly stick to live only though.
kb420 wrote:I came across this video yesterday on youtube, and I'm starting to think this guy has a point.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imfjSHo0nIA
Buleriachk wrote:NOW he tells me.....
kb420 wrote:I came across this video yesterday on youtube, and I'm starting to think this guy has a point.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imfjSHo0nIA
OK right away he tells the viewers to stick to the DAW that was bundled with your interface…. Sorry but that's about as lame a piece of advice as you can give. I get that most people don't need 90% of the features of any DAW, but all this advice is given by someone who seems to think that LIve and Logic are about as good as each other at various tasks, and that Pro Tools is the innovator DAW wise….. I get it in terms of making sure it's not a decision made on a whim because it's "new" ala Bitwig etc. but comparing DAWs to 100K consoles??kb420 wrote:I came across this video yesterday on youtube, and I'm starting to think this guy has a point.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imfjSHo0nIA
I put so much time in with Live that using another DAW at this point would actually just slow me down. I'm pretty fluent with Live in doing the things that I do. I just got Maschine, and even the learning curve on that is causing me to move slower than I can with Live and Drum Racks. The guy in the video really makes some good points.
Fair enough. In you situation, I would definitely have to agree. Personally, Live does everything that I need it to at the moment. I just wanted something different to mix in, and to be honest, I really don't want to worry about the lack of automation plugin delay compensation when and what's that's doing to my mix. When I took a hard look at what I do, I realized that at the moment it's just not that big of a deal. I'd be better off with some new low latency effects than buying and learning a new DAW. That's just the situation that I'm in. Everyone's situation is different.Machinesworking wrote:OK right away he tells the viewers to stick to the DAW that was bundled with your interface…. Sorry but that's about as lame a piece of advice as you can give. I get that most people don't need 90% of the features of any DAW, but all this advice is given by someone who seems to think that LIve and Logic are about as good as each other at various tasks, and that Pro Tools is the innovator DAW wise….. I get it in terms of making sure it's not a decision made on a whim because it's "new" ala Bitwig etc. but comparing DAWs to 100K consoles??
Though if it's more like you're hitting a creative block and think a new DAW will unleash it, then yeah.
Mostly I want to work with key commands when editing a song, Live falls drastically short in this regard, you can of course do all the same things with your mouse, but it's not the same. Live's focus is and should be on performance, and initial song ideas, when it comes time to beef it up or record guitar parts etc. I'm generally going to use something else.