Re: Petition To Have Ableton Hire Guy from AudioModder.com
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 10:44 am
He publicly stated that he was not involved.oddstep wrote:i thought Stray was involved in the coding for push. could be wrong.
He publicly stated that he was not involved.oddstep wrote:i thought Stray was involved in the coding for push. could be wrong.
but they definitely have taken his ideas, at least some of themTomViolenz wrote:He publicly stated that he was not involved.oddstep wrote:i thought Stray was involved in the coding for push. could be wrong.
Didn't know about PXT but looks cool.jestermgee wrote:Yeah I did the same thing for the Omnisphere and Trillian stuff. It's absolutely nothing more than creating an ableton patch-per-preset and no where ideal but a solution where there currently isn't one. No real skill involved in coding or integration, just some basic automated click scripts really.
As said, the PXT Live stuff from Stray is a great example of how good proper knowledge can be of benefit. IMHO if you were to present the Ableton Push interface solution and the Stray solution to a group and ask which would you prefer to use if you only could use one, Stray would win 100:1.
Yeah, I mean there are so many ways to implement this. It's one of those low hanging fruit issues that Ableton could benefit users tremendously.login wrote:I would still prefer MIDI program change, what would meke it superb would be a way to get the name of the preset on the Push screen drectly from the VST.