Page 2 of 4
Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2006 5:24 pm
by hambone1
Fantastic for playing live. Couldn't be simpler! (no pun intended...)
I use an FCB1010 to select one of 8 different Impulse kits, which can even be done in the middle of a fill. It switches almost instantly.
Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2006 6:14 pm
by the ar
I mainly use it to sequence my xbase in Live.
Works a treat.
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 3:01 pm
by jamester
johnisfaster
guru is a cpu beast and I didn't like it at all to be honost.
Yeah, I've been having a love/hate with the demo for a few months now.
lord toranaga
I use it alot. I have buit hundreds of custom kits.
real simple, D&D, great interface
Totally, and you've hit on my second question: When making your custom kits, do you find/create the samples yourself? I've been looking for a decent drum sample library to build some kits from. Was checking out SampleLab's Drum Fundamentals-
http://www.samplelab.com/slweb/df_info.jsp
Either that or go through all my Computer Music cd's and pick and choose hits...but that would take a whole day!
forge
I actually really like impulse as is - of course it's even better now that you can rack them together, and as soon as you can have all of the keys named in the midi editor by default then it's a done deal
Yeah, I'm really hoping the names will be in the midi editor as well...that would suck if only the first eight were.
for me personally the click on the end bug (which is getting addressed in 6 BTW) is not a deal breaker
That's good to hear! but...
hoffman2k
All it needs now is...a fix for that damn sample preview thing.
Uh-oh, what's that???
Now that I've finally got my Axiom pads to work with Impulse, things have been even more kick ass!
Thanks for all the responses guys!

Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 3:14 pm
by 5dots
Prior to impulse, I used to make all my beats in the arrangement view and then either cut & paste or consolidate them. When impulse was brought out, I was slow to get into it - I was used to my own workflow. Now it's all I use for making beats. I like that I can get the sounds right, then drop them into impulse, and have a minimum number of effects in impulse to play with things a little bit.
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 3:21 pm
by djadonis206
My brain is only so big and Impulse confuses me
For any and all drums I use Simpler (one shots) that way, one track - one drum
Now, If Impulse had a built in Sequencer like ReDrum or MicroTonic it would make it easier for my brain to comprehend having all those drums in one instrument
I'm serious - my brain is only so big
Oh and FYI - When you use the trick people use to cut a slice out of a loop and drag into Impulse for a drum part and get that click at the end
SIMPLER doesn't do that!
SIMPLER dawg, SIMPLER
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 3:33 pm
by mosca
the click in impulse was 'getting addressed' in Live 5
i'm not holding my breath
mo
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 3:35 pm
by glu
Would be nice to hear from the Abes on this one...

Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 3:46 pm
by jamester
Now, If Impulse had a built in Sequencer like ReDrum or MicroTonic it would make it easier for my brain to comprehend having all those drums in one instrument
Doesn't it though (pretty much)?
I mean, load a kit, double-click a cell in the track and voila! - an 8x16 step grid with all of the drums listed on the left.
I hate how ReDrum doesn't let you see where you put what without constantly clicking back and forth on the individual drums. You don't get a "big picture" until you send it to the sequencer...
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 3:55 pm
by djadonis206
jamester wrote:Now, If Impulse had a built in Sequencer like ReDrum or MicroTonic it would make it easier for my brain to comprehend having all those drums in one instrument
Doesn't it though (pretty much)?
I mean, load a kit, double-click a cell in the track and voila! - an 8x16 step grid with all of the drums listed on the left.
I hate how ReDrum doesn't let you see where you put what without constantly clicking back and forth on the individual drums. You don't get a "big picture" until you send it to the sequencer...
Nah, I need those little boxes at the bottom that light up when you turn them on

Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:05 pm
by dm_hawk
does anyone NOT like impulse?
sometimes i like it, sometimes not. i often use redrum or something instead, so i can run each drum part through its own effects chain. you can't do this in impulse, right? or am i smoking crack?
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:13 pm
by Rahlo
djadonis206 wrote:Nah, I need those little boxes at the bottom that light up when you turn them on


I hear you. I'm a huge redrum fan too, but over the last few months I've really come to dig Impulse just as much. Much easier to change grid resolutions, which opens up a whole new world when programming beats.
You can do the same thing in Reason, but you have to copy your pattern to the sequencer track first--not a big deal, just a minor workflow issue for me i guess.
Little lights would be dope on the impulse though!!

Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:16 pm
by Rahlo
dm_hawk wrote:does anyone NOT like impulse?
sometimes i like it, sometimes not. i often use redrum or something instead, so i can run each drum part through its own effects chain. you can't do this in impulse, right? or am i smoking crack?
c'mon man, put that pipe down!!
Seriously though, you can easily run each drum part through it's own fx chain by routing each individual impulse slot into the input of its own audio track, then applying fx. Easy as easy can be—though it can make your set seem really busy to the eye if you have lots of different drum parts you want to apply fx to!
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:17 pm
by djadonis206
dm_hawk wrote:does anyone NOT like impulse?
sometimes i like it, sometimes not. i often use redrum or something instead, so i can run each drum part through its own effects chain. you can't do this in impulse, right? or am i smoking crack?
uh oh - you can route each drum out of impulse to it's own track and effect, easy - it's exactly the same as Redrum in that respect
But I like Impulse I just don't use it - I prefer to load one drum into one instrument - keeps it simple to some degree for me
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:21 pm
by v00d00ppl
yea, i rock the impulse. i just chop p my samples in audition and drop them in imuplse and voila........my mpc 1000 replacement.......now all i really need is some nice pads like the mpd24.
but if you like impulse the sd2100 also has 8 sample slots and some nice parameters to tweak. irs' not sp1200 full quality, but it will give your drum samles a punch.
www.acquitrecords.om
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:25 pm
by Rahlo
djadonis206 wrote: I prefer to load one drum into one instrument - keeps it simple to some degree for me
I can see that. hmmm. hmmm.
So, do you mostly program your drums, or do you play them?