Page 2 of 2
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 1:19 pm
by CWoodOne
anti-banausic wrote:AdamJay wrote:anti-banausic wrote:Funny. I thought that Adamjay got 18% with his Macbook Pro. Maybe I was wrong.
Are you fronting?
I think you are.
The dual cores aren't going to give you that much.
ab
yea but he tested a QUAD CORE that is much faster on a core by core basis than my machine. 9% sounds right to me.
Oops, missed that. My bad.
That IS freaking amazing!!!!
Quad cores ROOL. Plus, that's just the most basic setup. I couldn't get the Mac Pro to recognize either one of my external interfaces, neither the FW410 or the Lexicon. Secondly, that's beta software and has debugging code that actually might have been slowing the system down, so the total performance might actually improve from 9% later on
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 2:46 pm
by longjohns
CWoodOne wrote: I couldn't get the Mac Pro to recognize either one of my external interfaces, neither the FW410 or the Lexicon.
but i saw mac talking to that digital camera from japan on TV! how could this be?!?!?!
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 4:04 pm
by gomi
longjohns wrote:CWoodOne wrote: I couldn't get the Mac Pro to recognize either one of my external interfaces, neither the FW410 or the Lexicon.
but i saw mac talking to that digital camera from japan on TV! how could this be?!?!?!
it's because m-audio are garbage and their drivers suck (yah you need drivers
for them, even on a mac.. instead of using coreaudio, which is awesome, they
wrote drivers... morons...)
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 4:23 pm
by Danny Futuro
I'd like to see what a dual 3ghz Mac Pro does.
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 12:41 am
by Bassfrq
Where can I find this file to test my CPU with?
Thanks!
Mac Pro RULES !!!
Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 3:42 pm
by technatural
I lost count on how much reverbs (decay wide open)and albino's i put in there
Still below 20 % (internal sound)
I'll let you guys know when it drops
Jalousy is a MF