Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 2:13 am
good call....kuniklo wrote:I'm sorry. I didn't realize you're stupid.Johnisslower wrote:
interesting. very very interesting. so doing the work yourself means your time is worthless. good call....
good call....kuniklo wrote:I'm sorry. I didn't realize you're stupid.Johnisslower wrote:
interesting. very very interesting. so doing the work yourself means your time is worthless. good call....
The point, which for some reason seems very difficult for some people to grasp, is that these are tools *for* sound design. These are single-cycle waveforms, not another sample library.suburbanbather wrote:Personally, this does not feel like something I would spend any money on. Anyone with a basic sound editor can make their own raw waveforms. If you have $30 burning a hole in your pocket + not enough time for sound design, then go for it.
Demo waveforms here:annihilator.1 wrote:id test a few single cycle waveforms in sampler first before buying because the loop in sampler has a minimum setting that may or may not be short enough.
i feel that this is not what either poster meant.anti-banausic wrote:I don't know what you guys are on about. This is so arcane. It reminds me of the discussion about using samples at all.....even for drum hits....some people are so arrogant.
If you don't make your own waveforms you aren't doing real sound design. Well, go code your own f@%^ing DAW then.
How different is it then dialing up a square or saw on a synth to make a nice bass sound? Besides, these can be looped, layered, it really isn't that different than having a bunch of oscillators. Ok, so perhaps not as tweakable with FM and additive, but geez.....really.....they are a nice tool. And they do save a bunch of time, and I bet you probably could make pretty unique sounds with them...
my .02
thank you and amen..anti-banausic wrote:I don't know what you guys are on about. This is so arcane. It reminds me of the discussion about using samples at all.....even for drum hits....some people are so arrogant.
If you don't make your own waveforms you aren't doing real sound design. Well, go code your own f@%^ing DAW then.
How different is it then dialing up a square or saw on a synth to make a nice bass sound? Besides, these can be looped, layered, it really isn't that different than having a bunch of oscillators. Ok, so perhaps not as tweakable with FM and additive, but geez.....really.....they are a nice tool. And they do save a bunch of time, and I bet you probably could make pretty unique sounds with them...
my .02
Mehsweetjesus wrote:cue hoffman2k in 3... 2... 1....
but some artists rembrandt and monet surely had to turn to certain techniques at certain times like grouding up natural dyes from minerals because you may not have been able to get the exact tone of paint they wanted.Spiralgroove wrote:even picasso buys his paint at the store
But I bet they didn't actually go dig them out of caves and such.sweetjesus wrote:but some artists rembrandt and monet surely had to turn to certain techniques at certain times like grouding up natural dyes from minerals because you may not have been able to get the exact tone of paint they wanted.Spiralgroove wrote:even picasso buys his paint at the store
Dude, you started it with the Mac-then-Asus BS. There was harmony in the force. And then you created the great rift. Now we need fucking Anakin to bring balance back to the force, and we all know how that shit turns out. It's all your fault!!!!!!sweetjesus wrote:
i feel that this is not what either poster meant.
its gotten a lil off hand
kiss and make up..
happy jesus week.