Page 2 of 2

Not that this will change any fanatic's mind...

Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:20 pm
by rasputin
You know, you can believe whatever you want, but if you want to think critically at least be informed about the technical and engineering work:

see http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm and
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technol ... tml?page=5

We now return to the conspiracy theories in progress.. (I personally think it was aliens in UFOs that looked like airliners)

r.

Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:31 pm
by The Phat Conductor
yea, tower 7 went down in an admittedly controlled demolition at around 5:30, but all of the official reports say it collapsed on it's own from fire damage (this never happened before or since).

everybody on the scene says they heard explosions, there is video fo firefighters evacuating the area saying 'this building is about to come down/blow up, please clear the area' and the owner went on tv saying it was a controlled demolition.

this was necessary to:

-collect insurance money
-eliminate evidence of this and other crimes (eg enron)
-maximize propaganda value

the official reports (NIST, FEMA, etc.) can't even agree on why it collapsed. it's the sloppiest part of this whole thing.

Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:48 pm
by TomTom
kooks