Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 3:09 pm
Some lists look like producers, some look like electronic music programmers, some are a mixture.
What is a producer, anyway?
What is a producer, anyway?
It depends on context. In techno/house/electro the artist/producer/"programmer" are often the same person.hambone1 wrote:Some lists look like producers, while some look like electronic music programmers.
What is a producer, anyway?
It's just a wordhambone1 wrote:So a guy in his bedroom with a laptop and bootleg copy of Live/Fruity Loops is a 'producer'?
Kinda cheapens the job title of the George Martins of the world. Too bad they couldn't have thought up a different word...
Whereas the original definition of the term 'producer' is closer to that of a film director - someone who guides the overall project, organises the resources & budget, song selection & arrangement and encourages the best from the performers for the material. This last in particular is a talent rarely found these days with individual vision being the sole driving force behind most projects - not a bad thing in terms of that individuals satisfaction but not always the best thing artistically for the overall project. YMMVrobin wrote: It depends on context. In techno/house/electro the artist/producer/"programmer" are often the same person.
hambone1 wrote:So a guy in his bedroom with a laptop and bootleg copy of Live/Fruity Loops is a 'producer'?
Kinda cheapens the job title of the George Martins of the world. Too bad they couldn't have thought up a different word...
I'm not disagreeing but as an example Derrick May could be said to be fullfilling all those criteria (OK when he was actually putting stuff out. It was rarely all him remember). As well as being the label boss and DJ who promoted the productions.Nod wrote:Whereas the original definition of the term 'producer' is closer to that of a film director - someone who guides the overall project, organises the resources & budget, song selection & arrangement and encourages the best from the performers for the material. This last in particular is a talent rarely found these days with individual vision being the sole driving force behind most projects - not a bad thing in terms of that individuals satisfaction but not always the best thing artistically for the overall project. YMMVrobin wrote: It depends on context. In techno/house/electro the artist/producer/"programmer" are often the same person.
I get your point. As technology has changed so has the meaning of the word.hambone1 wrote:I never said a thing about creativity.
I'm only wondering what a 'producer' is.
actually that sounds a little more like what the 'producer' of a film does not the director. except for the "encourages the best from the performers for the material" part.Nod wrote:Whereas the original definition of the term 'producer' is closer to that of a film director - someone who guides the overall project, organises the resources & budget, song selection & arrangement and encourages the best from the performers for the material. This last in particular is a talent rarely found these days with individual vision being the sole driving force behind most projects - not a bad thing in terms of that individuals satisfaction but not always the best thing artistically for the overall project. YMMVrobin wrote: It depends on context. In techno/house/electro the artist/producer/"programmer" are often the same person.
hambone1 wrote:So a guy in his bedroom with a laptop and bootleg copy of Live/Fruity Loops is a 'producer'?
Kinda cheapens the job title of the George Martins of the world. Too bad they couldn't have thought up a different word...
Yep - the term, like the technology, has evolved to mean something more & also something lessrobin wrote:I'm not disagreeing but as an example Derrick May could be said to be fullfilling all those criteria (OK when he was actually putting stuff out. It was rarely all him remember). As well as being the label boss and DJ who promoted the productions. I wouldn't say the way he goes about it makes him any less of as producer than George Martin.

Again agreed - it's just now the duties can be a lot less specific. It used to be the case that production and engineering were completely seperate disciplines - the latter generally featured white coated boffins fawning over Calrecs & EMI's rather than bald, white tshirted boffins fawning over laptops and calling themselves producers http://www.mercenary.com/emitgconsole.htmlhalfadder wrote:actually that sounds a little more like what the 'producer' of a film does not the director. except for the "encourages the best from the performers for the material" part.