Page 2 of 2

Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 5:54 pm
by ethios4
Johnisfaster wrote:obviously, but in theory they are supposed to be perfect voltage controlled waveforms aren't they? I mean a squarewave is supposed to be a perfect square right? wouldn't that sound the same always?
As with religion, the deviation from perfection is a major reason why each synth sounds different.

Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 8:01 pm
by benmiron
IT was just serviced so I am hoping it will last.


Also had LED replacements so mine is gonna look extra spiffy!!



CANT WAIT TO RUN THIS THROUGH HSOME DISTORTION AND ROCK THE F%&*$ OUT!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 8:03 pm
by benmiron

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 1:57 pm
by ytsek
CR78 wrote:Sold my 106 to my good buddy becuase he loved it so much and got myself a midi'd 60.
They're great bass and pad machines. Nothing beats that punchy bass that we all love.

Even though they're mono DCO, that sub-osc makes a huge difference.

The biggest problems with 106's is that a voice or two goes out; the bitch is that replacement chips are hard to find.

Have a blast.
You can buy cloned chips here for 40 EUR.
http://www.analoguerenaissance.com/D80017/


And here is a test procedure
http://www.analoguerenaissance.com/JUNOTEST/

Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 4:22 am
by CR78
ytsek

Nice find.

Now, if only someone could clone the SSM chip for my dying Rev2 Prophet 5. :(