Page 2 of 5

Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:04 pm
by b0unce
Machinate wrote:The b/w buchla 200 post - that's not fair though, because the main thing making esp. old buchlas UGLY is the COLOUR!
Image
:P
Thing is tho, when you see a pic of someone using a buchla 200e you get a sense of proportion...small is sexy I reckon. I only found out it actually folds into a case just recently.

unless there's some case-size confusion going on, I'm pretty sure they're all petite

Image

Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:07 pm
by Machinate
landrvr1 wrote:
Machinate wrote:The b/w buchla 200 post - that's not fair though, because the main thing making esp. old buchlas UGLY is the COLOUR!
Whaaaa? The cherry is beeeaauuutttiiiifffffulllllll.
yes, but the blue and red design of the modules, combined with the touch keyboards just... urgh. And b0unce, I am with you on the 200e, again. The old 200 non-e just doesn't even beGIN to measure up.

Anyone seen pics of the 200e folded?

Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:12 pm
by landrvr1
b0unce,

It's Big.

It's Beautiful.

And You're Going To Love It.

And I'm not talking about my cock, sorry.



http://www.flickr.com/photos/arrrika/165056512/



Gives a pretty good indication of scale. It's a control center. Mmmmm.

Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:14 pm
by b0unce
honourable mention for this little chappy:

Image

Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:17 pm
by b0unce
Machinate wrote: Anyone seen pics of the 200e folded?
Image

courtesy of soundonsound.
I'm pretty sure I seen another one on some blogger's review of the 200e

Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:22 pm
by thelike5
b0unce wrote:
Machinate wrote:The b/w buchla 200 post - that's not fair though, because the main thing making esp. old buchlas UGLY is the COLOUR!
Image
:P
Thing is tho, when you see a pic of someone using a buchla 200e you get a sense of proportion...small is sexy I reckon. I only found out it actually folds into a case just recently.

unless there's some case-size confusion going on, I'm pretty sure they're all petite

Image
Hey, that's Ezra Buchla, son of founder Don Buchla. He's in a really great band called Gowns who fucking blow the doors off of anything remotely called "indie" or "noise" rawk these days.

Super nice guy too.

Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 3:01 am
by forge
HA

I like the lone NS-10 at the top

Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 3:48 am
by theque

Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 3:48 am
by dj_huck
tonto it is sexy and portable, if you have a semi

http://www.tontosexpandingheadband.com/ ... _01_sm.jpg

Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 4:03 am
by Machinesworking
Blah! I want them all....... :evil:

Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 5:55 am
by Mesmer
For my generation .... maybe for me ... it doesn't get any *cooler* than:
Image

Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 5:58 am
by Mesmer
as for something from, you know, this decade ... this does it for me:
Image

Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 10:12 am
by Machinesworking
All I can say Mesmer is analogue>digital.
Digital is great for audio WAV/AIFF manipulation, not as great for evolving breathing atmospheric oscillators and filters.

Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 10:06 pm
by oblique strategies
Machinesworking wrote:All I can say Mesmer is analogue>digital.
Digital is great for audio WAV/AIFF manipulation, not as great for evolving breathing atmospheric oscillators and filters.
I have a Yamaha FS1R that excels at evolving breathing atmospheric stuff. But given it's unique character, it might be the exception to the rule.

Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 11:33 pm
by Mesmer
Machinesworking wrote:All I can say Mesmer is analogue>digital.
Digital is great for audio WAV/AIFF manipulation, not as great for evolving breathing atmospheric oscillators and filters.
I don't subscribe to that line of though.
but I respect it.

let's be pals! :wink:
-h