Page 2 of 2
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 10:00 pm
by nbinder
I wanna have the OSC implementation deeper than just like MIDI mappings. All parameters should be accessible as well as notes, track properties....
I hope the c74 partnership goes into that direction. Full control.
Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2008 5:37 pm
by jonnyfive
Matt_D wrote:maybe im alone here, but i was excited about OSC,
then i actually read the spec...
its a lexical, text based protocol..
maybe.
I like OSC because of the text interface. you could have access to everything that exists in the host without any abstraction BS, for example:
"\live\trackname\effectname\parametername value"
could do exactly what it looks like, which to me is a huge plus. dynamic control could be easily attained with a few simple string manipulations. really powerful, ime.
Plus the chips in these external devices are fast, i mean the iPhone was a screaming fast G4 in 2000.
+ 1! we want OSC!
Re: OSC Open Sound Control
Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:19 am
+1, more user friendly osc mapping tool /support even without the need of max for live - oh yeah, .... Usine, Reaktor, Reaper .... is coming to my mind,