Ableton Forum

koneko wrote:payed €500 for mine over a year ago.. but its because i lost my sanity for a second and push "buy" in ebay. nevertheless, its my only both hardware and analogue synth. no emulation sounds quite the same, but sometimes i trade all the goodness of the 101 with the automation, preset saving and all the other ease of using softsynth. it does make me feel good to have it there on my side and provide those rocking subs... nothing comes close to it.

consider the mc-202 though. they're a bit cheaper, catch less space . . . arguably sounds the same

oh, and do buy reaktor

I'm a huge mc-202 fan, the sequencing is a bit of a pain at first but if you focus on it for a while you'll start to understand it no problem and then you'll feel like a genious when you program patterns of course you could always use a midi-cv if you have the cv in mod done on it. I've wanted an sh-101 for years but the mc-202 takes up less space and I'm not much of a key player anyway. it comes down to how much space you have an whether or not you think you'll get use out of the keys. I'm not exactly sure what the sound differences are though, the few demo's I've heard on youtube of the 101 could easily be a 202.

at one point i had a 101, 202, 303, 505, 606, 707, 727, 808 and 909 in my bedroom. it was like roccos reverse gang bang only with 1980's music equipment. all items were mint. i was a fucking GOD. i made nothing worth hearing with it and sold it all to pay the rent. goodbye

oh and a 626

interesting, you just made me realize that for some reason they skipped 404

or did they?

TITBAG wrote:at one point i had a 101, 202, 303, 505, 606, 707, 727, 808 and 909 in my bedroom. it was like roccos reverse gang bang only with 1980's music equipment. all items were mint. i was a fucking GOD. i made nothing worth hearing with it and sold it all to pay the rent. goodbye

So they all fucked you or you fucked all of them?

Rocco Sifredi! LOL!

Johnisfaster wrote:interesting, you just made me realize that for some reason they skipped 404

or did they?

Please read this wonderful article!!

http://musicthing.blogspot.com/2006/07/numbers_18.html

Hilarious.

I must be crazy but I can't find an article on there, I know it's looking me right in the face but all I see is pictures of roland gear and a bunch of comments that explain the japanese word for 4 is really similar to death. which I suppose is the reason why there is no 404

I would pay up to about €280 for one.

Johnisfaster wrote:I must be crazy but I can't find an article on there, I know it's looking me right in the face but all I see is pictures of roland gear and a bunch of comments that explain the japanese word for 4 is really similar to death. which I suppose is the reason why there is no 404

Man, I guess it must have been removed...

Yeah, basically, you are right; the number 4 in Japan is similar to the number 13 in America (I'm not sure if 13 gets freaky all over the world). 4 is pronounced "che" or "she" which is very close to the word for death.

Roland skipped the 404 but then came back a few years later and released a cheap little SP-404 sampler so I guess they bit the bullet or it's no longer a supersitition or something? Maybe the founder of Roland didn't go for it and they have a new President? Who's to say...

thelike5 wrote:

Johnisfaster wrote:I must be crazy but I can't find an article on there, I know it's looking me right in the face but all I see is pictures of roland gear and a bunch of comments that explain the japanese word for 4 is really similar to death. which I suppose is the reason why there is no 404

Man, I guess it must have been removed...

Yeah, basically, you are right; the number 4 in Japan is similar to the number 13 in America (I'm not sure if 13 gets freaky all over the world). 4 is pronounced "che" or "she" which is very close to the word for death.

Roland skipped the 404 but then came back a few years later and released a cheap little SP-404 sampler so I guess they bit the bullet or it's no longer a supersitition or something? Maybe the founder of Roland didn't go for it and they have a new President? Who's to say...

so it's decided then, if I ever release a piece of music gear I'm calling it "death o death"

What about this "new" SH-201?

topic: SH-201,
go.

it's not analogue, 'kay,
but what if it was?
go.

i wonder why it isn't analog.

Is it really so hard to make a relatively inexpensive analog monosynth?



.lm.

Mesmer wrote:What about this "new" SH-201?

topic: SH-201,
go.

It's pretty lame, from what I understand. A toy version of the JP-8000 (which is a bit of a modern classic).

Anyway, back to the 101. For the (kind of outrageous) money they go for, I'd pick an SH-2 instead. No sequencer, but 2 oscillators (+sub), and I like the look better. An SH-09 is another, slightly cheaper, option which basically has the same features and sound as the 101 (minus the sequencer, but really, who uses that?).