NSFW: The unofficial "dhilsabeck posts a random pic" thread

[TomViolenz]

-

[cmcpress]

I don't care for either of these logos. The one you posted doesn't even make any sense.

[TomViolenz]

-

[jestermgee]

I'm a 39year old curmudgeon, so don't mind me....

But I still don't get how that is in any way interesting, attention grabing, original or what have you....

"dhilsabeck posts a random pic" thread

As long as it fits the original title of the thread I believe it is acceptable and it's a random image. But please, continue your oppression of peoples choice.

[regretfullySaid]

+1

If you've ever wanted to avoid someone who wants to talk to you, playing deaf and dumb seems to make sense to me.

I think it would apply well to this thread actually, considering it's a pic thread and not a conversation thread.
If you're going to carry on a conversation, have some manners and post something, anything, like this:

Frances Glessner Lee (1878-1962) was a millionaire heiress and Chicago society dame
with a very unusual hobby for a woman raised according to the strictest standards of nineteenth century domestic life:
investigating murder. And she did this through a most unexpected medium: dollhouse-like dioramas.

[TomViolenz]

-

[Samuel L. Jizzle]

[regretfullySaid]

[regretfullySaid]

[Forge.]

Caffeine under an electron microscope:



http://www.policymic.com/articles/84925 ... by-science

[jbodango]

Caffeine under an electron microscope:

http://www.policymic.com/articles/84925 ... by-science

That was a cool read!

[regretfullySaid]

Indeed

[TomViolenz]

-

[Angstrom]

[jbodango]