Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 9:12 pm
now whos making generalizations.
notice i never said that jews were NOT living there. but the STATE of israel did not exist until the 20th century. FACT. and they displaced arabs and their homes with force. FACTshtreimel wrote:Uh, you're wrong. Jews have been living in Israel/Palestine for thousands of years. And don't get me started on the whole...what is, or isn't, a Palestinian debate? Personally, I believe they're entitled to a country. And I believe that it should reflect the reality of a people who've rejected said country time and time again (read UN resolutions and documentation from '48 on).djshiva wrote: and i had to add that when speaking of israel/palestine, people tend to forget that the palestinians were living there BEFORE the inception of the state of israel.
David Ben Gurion (the first Israeli Prime Minister): "If I were an Arab leader, I would never sign an agreement with Israel. It is normal; we have taken their country. It is true God promised it to us, but how could that interest them? Our God is not theirs. There has been Anti - Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault ? They see but one thing: we have come and we have stolen their country. Why would they accept that?"shtreimel wrote:Forget about God. Most biblical/historical scholars agree that a tribe of Hebrews lived in this area over 4000 years ago. If nothing else, history and archeology support the Jewish concept of Zionism i.e. a return to a homeland. And of course, the fact that Jews have been living in Jerusalem for 1000's of years adds weight to that non-God argument.djshiva wrote: israel's claim to the land is a biblical mandate that is difficult to justify by those who do not believe the bible gets to justify anything.
"It is the duty of Israeli leaders to explain to public opinion, clearly and courageously, a certain number of facts that are forgotten with time. The first of these is that there is no Zionism,colonialization or Jewish State without the eviction of the Arabs and the expropriation of their lands." Yoram Bar Porath, Yediot Aahronot, of 14 July 1972.shtreimel wrote:Zionists were very, very secular people. DJSHIVA, we've been though this over and over again. Where are you getting your source material?djshiva wrote: if someone comes into my home and lays claim to it based on a religious mandate,.
Oh man, this is painful.
fortunately for US, the abes didn't feel the need to bomb the crap out of steinberg to accomplish their "marketing". *random snipey comment cuz now i am just annoyed*shtreimel wrote:So says you. Hey Shiva, perhaps your music isn't marketable. I ain't too sure. One thing I know is...show me an artist who doesn't want their music heard, and/or have an opportunity to make money making music (this takes marketing my dear), I'll show you an artist whose music isn't able to generate the attention or funds. C'est la vie.djshiva wrote:that boldfaced word does more to illustrate the impetus for western foreign policy than all these pages of arguments and debates have...shtreimel wrote: I thank God that there have been, and continue to be, soldiers and politicians who are brave enough to use violence when justified, yet humble enough to know when not to. It's choices like these that provide us (artists) the freedom to compose and market our music.
Why is it that whacky lefties always parrot the same lines...
Country/Nation = greedy, suspicious, evil
War = genocide
Making money = bad
Oh and Ms. Shiva...it's marketing that has allowed Live to become the incredible software it has become. Thankfully the likes of yourself sit behind turntables and not in the Live boardroom.
So what’s your point? There wasn’t a state for Palestinians either. The UN sanctioned two states, for two people. The Arabs and their neighbors rejected this idea…OVER AND OVER AND OVER again. I’m assuming you know this, or do I have to provide sources?djshiva wrote:
notice i never said that jews were NOT living there. but the STATE of israel did not exist until the 20th century. FACT.
FACT: Cops have guns that kill peopledjshiva wrote:
and they displaced arabs and their homes with force. FACT
Shiva…I can cut and past a whole whack of nasty quotes from Arab leaders who:djshiva wrote: David Ben Gurion (the first Israeli Prime Minister): "If I were an Arab leader, I would never sign an agreement with Israel. It is normal; we have taken their country. It is true God promised it to us, but how could that interest them? Our God is not theirs. There has been Anti - Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault ? They see but one thing: we have come and we have stolen their country. Why would they accept that?"
DJSHIVA, you're out of your league. And it's clear by your cut/paste quotes. Your John Lennon-esque (with a pinch of Marx) ideology sounds lovely in a 1st year polic sci paper, but doesn't really say much about how to deal with:djshiva wrote:
i will state for the record that i am done with this conversation, since schtreimel is more concerned with throwing about insults at "wacky lefties" than actually engaging in a reasoned dialogue.
buh bye now. you'll get to justify your beliefs to your maker someday. and his opinion will probably be met with justifications for wholesale murder. good luck with that.
Good, back to talking about the video piece...RobertX wrote:Pretty interesting piece... up until he said that half of the hijackers were alive, while offering no proof. Oh... Mohammed Atta's dad said he heard from him on September 12th? That solves the whole puzzle!!
Just one more conspiracy nut job out there with an opinion.
Check out this article in Popular Science. It debunks many of the points brought up by this piece.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science ... page=1&c=y
And this is where I find I'm lost as well. Since my academic background did not include physics/chemistry, I'm lost as to the physical proofs/debunks of how buildings collapse, planes explode etc. My intuition, informed by an understanding of history and commerce, tells me that the US was attacked in a manner presented by mainstream media. However how we got from there i.e. our dubious dealings (and unchecked consumption patterns) with ME countries to here (being under constant alert), is something that should be discussed and debated.sweetjesus wrote: I posted a link to the popular science thing oh... 10 or so pages ago, but someone said that someone has debunked the debunking theories...

Posted yesterday"henry ford wrote:yes - interesting
henry ford wrote: i too, am out.
notice how that when i say I;m leaving, I actually leave.
bye shitmill.
exactly....yesterday being the operative word.shtreimel wrote: Posted yesterday"