b0unce,
You are really all too entertaining. Why would I need a film when I can just come here and chat with you?
SHITE!!! - Virginia Tech 33 Dead (Vs 18,000 Dead)?
Fucking great post.b0unce wrote:
heh, you're statement might resonate with americans...
but to the rest of the world, who deal with american foreign policy every day, and have done so for years, how are we supposed to empathise with you ? and should we ? and why would you expect us to ? 33 dead americans ? boo hoo ?...185 dead iraqis today, probably more. You know how I feel about the palestine, no need for me to wax on about that....
where's the weeping americans and round the clock media circus every time a child is shot in gaza by the american sponsored IDF ? oh ya...thats not shocking enough, thats expected ?......pffffffff
I'm not debating the tragic loss of life.
I'm sick to the stomach of the assumption that one rich white American kid is worth 2000 sand niggers.
Where were the remembrance boards and flowers and solemn news reports when "Shock and Awe" incinerated a thousand innocents in one night?
But of course they're not innocent are they - because they're sand niggers.
Radialson: If you're so passionate about preserving "life", where are your impassioned screeds about the every increasing piles of dead children and innocent adults appearing wherever your nation spreads it's diseased "foriegn policy" tentacles?
I feel I'd be able to muster an iota of respect for your position if you were as protective of those brown kids far away as you are of the All American Zygote.
-
djadonis206
- Posts: 6490
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2004 4:23 pm
- Location: Seattle, WA.
As the story unfolds, it seems this guy (The Korean) didn't just wake up and go ona shooting rampageb0unce wrote:djadonis206 wrote:Do you guys really think "guns" kill people? People kill people
Sure lets get rid of all the guns, all the tobacco, all the cocoa, all the alcohol, mcdonalds, burger king and anything else that contributes to senceless death
then what? People will still find a way to kill each other
instead of focusing on the gun focus on the person
I'm sure he'd have killed 32 people and 5 more in critical condition...with a stick ? or a stone maybe ?
guns make it too easy to kill someone. maybe a bomb would have caused as much or more carnage, but its not nearly as easy to put together, plant, execute ...etc , and importantly it would take planning. it would be pre-meditated.
I'm certain that alot of the gun murders in the USA happen shortly after someone is pissed off, flips out. If they didnt have a gun, by the time they'd conceivably be in a position to murder - they may have calmed down.
with a gun, you can get the idea to kill and achieve it rapidly.
ffs.
C
NBC got some package (Probably sent by president bush) with all kinds of video, photo's and what-not
this guy knew well in advance what he was going to do - he bought one of the guns a week prior to the shooting
had guns been illegal he'd probably cop one off the street
there's no real answer here - the guy was a psycho
I see we have some real zygote intelligence in this thread. If you knew how to read, you would have seen that:Radialson: If you're so passionate about preserving "life", where are your impassioned screeds about the every increasing piles of dead children and innocent adults appearing wherever your nation spreads it's diseased "foriegn policy" tentacles?
I feel I'd be able to muster an iota of respect for your position if you were as protective of those brown kids far away as you are of the All American Zygote.
1.) I never said I didn't care about those you addressed
2.) In no place did I say I supported U.S. foreign policy
Go study the facts for a few years, then come back and reply when you brighten up.
BTW: What are you doing about your sob story? If nothing other than coming here to vent, then shut it, because you're just another hypocrite.
Last edited by freqn on Wed Apr 18, 2007 10:53 pm, edited 4 times in total.
-
OvertoneZero
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 9:16 pm
I don't know about all of the grand debates going on here but yeah I pretty much agree that just looking at this specific case as an isolated incident and not drawing connections to the larger picture, gun control wouldn't have stopped this guy. He was determined, for lack of a better word.
However, fixing the society that produces people like this is another matter altogether...
However, fixing the society that produces people like this is another matter altogether...
-
djadonis206
- Posts: 6490
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2004 4:23 pm
- Location: Seattle, WA.
radialson wrote:
I never said I didn't care about those you addressed...
Well, can you clear this up for me and link me to where you speak out passionately in defence of dead Arab children, just like at the beginning of this thread where you make your impassioned speech in defence of single cell organisms?
Just to show you care as much about actual children as you do about potential ones.
The other thing you may be able to help me with is the contradiction inherent in being "Pro-Life" and "Pro-Gun" - seeing as how handguns are designed, primarily, to kill people.
You see, I can't help being of the opinion that if there were no guns there would be no gun deaths and try as I might I can't seem to reconcile that any other way.
Children are children, even if they aren't fully develpoed. That's all that I am going to debate. Your sob story is your responsibility, and I don't see you saying much about something you claim to be so passionate about.popslut wrote:radialson wrote:
I never said I didn't care about those you addressed...
Well, can you clear this up for me and link me to where you speak out passionately in defence of dead Arab children, just like at the beginning of this thread where you make your impassioned speech in defence of single cell organisms?
Just to show you care as much about actual children as you do about potential ones.
The other thing you may be able to help me with is the contradiction inherent in being "Pro-Life" and "Pro-Gun" - seeing as how handguns are designed, primarily, to kill people.
You see, I can't help being of the opinion that if there were no guns there would be no gun deaths and try as I might I can't seem to reconcile that any other way.
Republicans are pro-life until you're born, then they're pro-death penalty, pro-war and pro-guns. They think that if you're among the elite (aka Jesus) you won't fall into crime or be drafted, but you can start wars and PROFIT!popslut wrote:The other thing you may be able to help me with is the contradiction inherent in being "Pro-Life" and "Pro-Gun" - seeing as how handguns are designed, primarily, to kill people.
I'm pro-abortion, not pro-choice.
That's because you're not looking.radialson wrote:I don't see you saying much about something you claim to be so passionate about.
'm sick to the stomach of the assumption that one rich white American kid is worth 2000 sand niggers.
Where were the remembrance boards and flowers and solemn news reports when "Shock and Awe" incinerated a thousand innocents in one night?
But of course they're not innocent are they - because they're sand niggers.
Sorry bud,popslut wrote:That's because you're not looking.radialson wrote:I don't see you saying much about something you claim to be so passionate about.
'm sick to the stomach of the assumption that one rich white American kid is worth 2000 sand niggers.
Where were the remembrance boards and flowers and solemn news reports when "Shock and Awe" incinerated a thousand innocents in one night?
But of course they're not innocent are they - because they're sand niggers.
All I see is the normal ant-american blame game. If you're going to have a cause, then at least do something significant about it and stop whining .
