M. Bréqs wrote:You're right - I doubt that many do that to pigs, that was hyperbole. Perhaps I should have said child-molesting polygamists or apostate-stoners or rape victim executors or mass murderers instead?
Seeing as al-Qaeda are to my knowledge more of a militia than a police force and are not enforcing laws anywhere, only the last point on that last applies.
Well, my running shoes are made in Canada, and I am a very conscious consumer. That said, the economic exploitation of sweat-shop labour is mostly facilitated by the host nations... If all of them actually tried to protect their own people and not race to the bottom, there wouldn't be that problem. Maybe what they need is an international union.
Communist!
Yes, Western Civilization has its bad points - many of my fellows are only too ignorant of the human costs of cheap labour. However, democracy, personal freedom and rationalism are all products of that same civilization. I would argue that we contribute more to the world's wellbeing than we contribute to world suffering. If North American / European / Japanese / Australian aid (and economic activity) were to disappear overnight, the majority of the world's population would suddenly find itself in far worse state.
I'm not quite sure of the maths, there, but you are of course correct that we have historically contributed both good and bad things. In some places the bad is more obvious than the good, though (think Once Were Warriors).
The worst thing that can happen to the planet is renewed American isolationism.
I don't know. I'm not sure it would be good, granted, but the current state of Project For The New American Century domination has IMHO hitherto not been a success.
M. Bréqs wrote:I get your meaning - a Talib is a student, the Taliban literally means nothing more than that,
Very good!
but they have self identified as raving, murdering psychos, so the term unforutnately sticks. For having no friends in the Taliban, you sure seem to want to help them out by decrying our efforts to help out the Afghan people. Perhaps not personal friends, but ideological / religious comrades perhaps?
I have not had religious comrades in Afghanistan for at least fifteen hundred years. The Taliban made a quite direct attack on 'my heritage', so my disproval of the Coalition invasion is most certainly not based on sympathy for them.
(You'll know that very few Muslims actually sympathise with the Taliban - even some of the most radical ones find them exceptionally stupid)
...and you have failed to refute my point that they are parasites who make life worse for their own people (and Canadians who send our sons and brothers to die and be injured at their hands in an effort to help).
I have not "failed to", I have "not tried to".
noisetonepause wrote:I am sad if not surprised to see that your ignorance of history is as flawless as your ignorance of contemporary issues.
Love,
Paws
I am sad if not surprised to see that
your ignorance of history is as flawless as
your ignorance of contemporary issues.
nyah-nyah-na-nyah-nyah.
respect,
Bréqs
Yeah? Well YOU SMELL!
So there!
-P