How's this for a rebuttal:landrvr1 wrote: *landrvr1 sits back and waits for the rebuttals in which people will dispute the mass killings that the Russians perpetrated on their own people or, at the very least, say it was only like a million people or so. Just a million.
andydes wrote:How's this for a rebuttal:landrvr1 wrote: *landrvr1 sits back and waits for the rebuttals in which people will dispute the mass killings that the Russians perpetrated on their own people or, at the very least, say it was only like a million people or so. Just a million.
Get the fuck out of this forum. Seriously. I found you amusing for a while, but the obvious glee you get from the surfering of innocent people makes me physically sick. Cunt.
Well, this leads us down the "That's no different than when *you* funded..." pathandydes wrote:I think you'd need to have a little more than that to conclude the US was behind it.4.33 wrote: well, saakashivili HAS BEEN funded by the US government. as well as youshenko in the ukraine. that's a fact, actually...
but supporting a foreign government does not directly equate to being responsible for it's actions. I would agree it does raise the probability, but there is not a direct connection.andydes wrote: but for fucks sake throw us a bone here and show us you’re capable of discussing the facts.
Well it's obvious you're finding the whole topic highly entertaining at least.landrvr1 wrote:andydes wrote:How's this for a rebuttal:landrvr1 wrote: *landrvr1 sits back and waits for the rebuttals in which people will dispute the mass killings that the Russians perpetrated on their own people or, at the very least, say it was only like a million people or so. Just a million.
Get the fuck out of this forum. Seriously. I found you amusing for a while, but the obvious glee you get from the surfering of innocent people makes me physically sick. Cunt.
I get glee from the suffering of innocents?
omfg.
How can I start to amuse you again? What can I do to get back into your good graces?
...
mikemc wrote:Well, this leads us down the "That's no different than when *you* funded..." pathandydes wrote:I think you'd need to have a little more than that to conclude the US was behind it.4.33 wrote: well, saakashivili HAS BEEN funded by the US government. as well as youshenko in the ukraine. that's a fact, actually...
I think it's fair to say that even if Georgia's attack on South Ossetia was not answered by a Russian military response, this wouldn't have worked out to the US advantage: we'd still end up being supporters of someone who used military force against the population in the territory he governs, which resulting in damage to civilian property and non-combatant deaths.
I *want* to hear our government saying that Saakawhatsis' use of force was inappropriate, and that they are constructively involved in a peaceful solution. I *don't* like the idea that my government would foment and then somehow take advantage of a situation knowing that it would involve civilians getting killed (even though I'm pretty sure they are capable of it).
Sorry little sadface emoticon. Everyone loves to use you in the Iraq threads, but forget about you for....oh.....all other forms of violence around the world. Now, this is just completely ignoring the facts as reported by many corroborating sources. Yes, they did.landrvr1 wrote:
The Georgian Army moved into South Ossetia?
l8randydes wrote:Well it's obvious you're finding the whole topic highly entertaining at least.landrvr1 wrote:andydes wrote: How's this for a rebuttal:
Get the fuck out of this forum. Seriously. I found you amusing for a while, but the obvious glee you get from the surfering of innocent people makes me physically sick. Cunt.
I get glee from the suffering of innocents?
omfg.
How can I start to amuse you again? What can I do to get back into your good graces?
...
Ah, whatever. I'm out of here.
you're talking to one of them, asshole. I'm sure you've been out on the street since day one. Bullshit.landrvr1 wrote:
An insult to the thousands upon thousands who have peacefully protested this war either from the beginning or later. An insult to those who have lobbied their representatives on a consistent basis; who have actually made some sort of effort to end this fiasco.
.
mikemc wrote:Now, this is just completely ignoring the facts as reported by many corroborating sources. Yes, they did.landrvr1 wrote:
The Georgian Army moved into South Ossetia?
Re: 'Killing Machine', distorting/inflating certain aspects of history and then citing others is just silly. I mean, face a Mongol Horde sometime and see how that changes your worldview.
Fact: tens of millions of indigenous North and South Americans killed so you can have corn-fed beef.
Fact: tens of millions of all sorts of Europeans killed in all sorts of conflicts.
Fact: tens of tens of millions of Asians killed in all sorts of conflicts.
Fact: untold numbers of children burned alive in braziers during the centuries in which Mediterranean and Middle Eastern cultures worshipped idols and practiced human sacrifice.
All candidates for 'killing machine'
leisuremuffin wrote:you're talking to one of them, asshole. I'm sure you've been out on the street since day one. Bullshit.landrvr1 wrote:
An insult to the thousands upon thousands who have peacefully protested this war either from the beginning or later. An insult to those who have lobbied their representatives on a consistent basis; who have actually made some sort of effort to end this fiasco.
.
.lm.
