LIVE FIVE PERFORMANCE TEST - results here

Discuss music production with Ableton Live.
Dr. Zoiberg
Posts: 451
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 2:05 pm
Location: Italy
Contact:

Post by Dr. Zoiberg » Wed Oct 05, 2005 1:42 am

Jubei, I have an iMac exactly like yours, a 15" G4 800mhz.

If I remember correctly, you could be right saying that it doesn't show you the cpu speed option. I remeber it surprised me a bit when I found it on the powerbook.
The bad thing is my iMac is now being serviced, so I can't check.

Your test score doesn't surprise me, this iMac is much much slower than the 1.25 ghz powerbook, with every app.

AdamJay
Posts: 4757
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: Indianapolis, USA

Post by AdamJay » Wed Oct 05, 2005 1:57 am

Dr. Zoiberg wrote:Jubei, I have an iMac exactly like yours, a 15" G4 800mhz.

If I remember correctly, you could be right saying that it doesn't show you the cpu speed option. I remeber it surprised me a bit when I found it on the powerbook.
The bad thing is my iMac is now being serviced, so I can't check.

Your test score doesn't surprise me, this iMac is much much slower than the 1.25 ghz powerbook, with every app.
Zoiberg,
Jubei's mac is this:

2) Laptop/Desktop? Make/Model - Desktop/ imac g4 17inch
3) Operating System - 10.3.9
4) CPU Make Model and Speed - G4 1.25 ghz

not an 800mhz,

he just used the results of an 800mhz iMac to illustrate how WAY off his results are.

Dr. Zoiberg
Posts: 451
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 2:05 pm
Location: Italy
Contact:

Post by Dr. Zoiberg » Wed Oct 05, 2005 2:01 am

8O

:oops:

:D

camarao
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:15 am
Location: Lisbon

Post by camarao » Wed Oct 05, 2005 6:34 pm

Adam,

how is your test with your Powerbook ?

AdamJay
Posts: 4757
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: Indianapolis, USA

Post by AdamJay » Wed Oct 05, 2005 8:01 pm

camarao wrote:Adam,

how is your test with your Powerbook ?
check the first page of this thread.

camarao
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:15 am
Location: Lisbon

Post by camarao » Thu Oct 06, 2005 5:07 pm

AdamJay wrote:
camarao wrote:Adam,

how is your test with your Powerbook ?
check the first page of this thread.
You get 66%.

I get 80 % with a 1,67hz Powerbook, OSX 10.4.2 and 1,5gb ram ! I have the processor to highest. What am I doing wrong ? Is something wrong with my computer ? Should I reinstall the OS ? Are there any tricks to improve performance ?

I know these are too many questions, but I'm really worried with this test thing...

Thank for your help.

AdamJay
Posts: 4757
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: Indianapolis, USA

Post by AdamJay » Thu Oct 06, 2005 7:45 pm

camarao wrote:
AdamJay wrote:
camarao wrote:Adam,

how is your test with your Powerbook ?
check the first page of this thread.
You get 66%.

I get 80 % with a 1,67hz Powerbook, OSX 10.4.2 and 1,5gb ram ! I have the processor to highest. What am I doing wrong ? Is something wrong with my computer ? Should I reinstall the OS ? Are there any tricks to improve performance ?

I know these are too many questions, but I'm really worried with this test thing...

Thank for your help.
did you go through this in preferences:

Audio - Input Audio Device > "No Input"
Audio - Output Buffer Latency > "512 Samples" (if you can't get latency this low - set it as low as you can without pops'n'clicks and make a note in your post)
Audio - Sample Rate > "44100"
Audio - Overall Latency - "0ms" latency compensation
MAKE SURE DELAY COMPENSATION IS TURNED ON under the options menu (This is a new v.5 feature that does indeed use cpu cycles and is critical to the test)

Midi/Sync - Remote Control Surfaces - NONE, NONE, and NONE.



and what sound card are you using?
some firewire soundcards will induce a higher cpu load.

markaugust
Posts: 470
Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 11:48 am
Location: big B

Post by markaugust » Thu Oct 06, 2005 11:36 pm

was reading this and checked my old G4 933 mHz within the optionsmenu, and found also no option to increase processor performance, checked the helpmenu, and it said this:


For PowerBooks, iBooks, and Power Mac G5 computers, choose Highest from the Processor Performance pop-up menu to allow your computer to work at its fastest. This uses more energy. Choose Reduced to save energy. This may cause your computer to work more slowly.
Some models support the Automatic setting, which allows your computer to switch rapidly back and forth between the Highest and Reduced settings to optimize energy use, depending on how much work the processor is doing.


So I guess no I-macs or G4's have that option?
Let's hope It works as fast as possible by default

(no usefull info, but telling anywayz;I am switching over to PC in a weeks time; never thought it for possible, but ableton did the damage.....needed a laptop and need the power; dell inspiron 9300 pentium M 2.26 coming up!)

Jubei
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 2:18 pm

Post by Jubei » Thu Oct 06, 2005 11:57 pm

^^^^ that explains a lot. thanks.

metaforensics
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 4:07 pm
Location: Southern Kalifornia

Post by metaforensics » Fri Oct 07, 2005 2:41 am

1.cpu 37%, and 35% using mbox (usb 1.0)
2.Laptop dell 9100
3.Windows xp sp1
4. 3.2 ghz p4
5.1gig of ram
6. used stock card, and mbox
7.60gb internal 7200rpm

Its funny I would of thought the macs would did alot better. But going through all these post, and seeing the average being about 65%. Man whats even cooler is as I'm writin this the test is not goin above 35%.
late :lol: :lol:

minimal
Posts: 939
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 9:57 am
Location: zh - switzerland
Contact:

Post by minimal » Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:23 am

markaugust wrote:
(no usefull info, but telling anywayz;I am switching over to PC in a weeks time; never thought it for possible, but ableton did the damage.....needed a laptop and need the power; dell inspiron 9300 pentium M 2.26 coming up!)
mmmhh... please post the result you have with your new computer... I think you'll have 20% or even less, as I have 25% w/Pentium M 1.8, you should get the best resutl here I think.

djshiva
Posts: 725
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 4:42 am
Location: indianapolis, USA
Contact:

Post by djshiva » Fri Oct 07, 2005 6:21 am

1) Ableton Live CPU Meter: low 29% peak 35% avg 32%
2) Laptop/Desktop: Custom Built Desktop Shuttle SK83G
3) Operating System: Windows XP Pro SP2
4) CPU Make Model and Speed: Athlon 64 3000+ 2Ghz
5) Amount of Ram / Speed of Ram : 512megs DDR
6) Soundcard: SB Live w/ ASIO4all drivers
7) Hard Disk Drive Speed: 7200rpm

no glitches.
http://www.soundcloud.com/djshiva
http://www.facebook.com/djshivamusic
http://sapphicbeats.blogspot.com

Macbook Pro Core 2 Duo / OSX / 2Gb RAM / Ableton Live 8 / Akai LPD8/LPK25

camarao
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:15 am
Location: Lisbon

Post by camarao » Fri Oct 07, 2005 9:07 am

AdamJay wrote:
camarao wrote:
AdamJay wrote: check the first page of this thread.
You get 66%.

I get 80 % with a 1,67hz Powerbook, OSX 10.4.2 and 1,5gb ram ! I have the processor to highest. What am I doing wrong ? Is something wrong with my computer ? Should I reinstall the OS ? Are there any tricks to improve performance ?

I know these are too many questions, but I'm really worried with this test thing...

Thank for your help.
did you go through this in preferences:

Audio - Input Audio Device > "No Input"
Audio - Output Buffer Latency > "512 Samples" (if you can't get latency this low - set it as low as you can without pops'n'clicks and make a note in your post)
Audio - Sample Rate > "44100"
Audio - Overall Latency - "0ms" latency compensation
MAKE SURE DELAY COMPENSATION IS TURNED ON under the options menu (This is a new v.5 feature that does indeed use cpu cycles and is critical to the test)

Midi/Sync - Remote Control Surfaces - NONE, NONE, and NONE.



and what sound card are you using?
some firewire soundcards will induce a higher cpu load.
I finnaly found the problem : you told to disable the Remote Control Surfaces but I disabled also all the MIDI instruments that were controlling Live. The result was 69 % (with the internal soundcard).

Last question : what is the PC equivalent to the G4 1,67ghz ? My point is that , maybe Live for Mac is more slow than with an equivalent PC machine. Something Ableton could fix with an update for Mac users, maybe...

wavejumper
Posts: 298
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 2:26 pm
Contact:

criticism

Post by wavejumper » Fri Oct 07, 2005 1:34 pm

"maybe Live for Mac is more slow than with an equivalent PC machine. Something Ableton could fix with an update for Mac users, maybe...

shhh, we are not allowed to think that here. verboten.

fossilfool
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 12:35 am
Contact:

Performance test looks wierd in my machine...

Post by fossilfool » Fri Oct 07, 2005 9:19 pm

Guys,

When I load this set, it sounds perfect, but I can't see the normal scene layout. Any tips? Screenshot below.

Thanks a lot,

Paul


Image

Post Reply