That explains the general phenom, but using the classic face on Mars example is a bit suspect. The new pass was apparently super filtered to obscure any detailing. Now I'm all for extreme filtering, but they basically went Crimewatch and blurred out the face. And then said, look, no face.8O wrote:This explains the Mars rat: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-22686500
I don't mean to get all myrnova about it, but the BBC is hopeless at explaining things nowadays. A few years back I was listening to a Radio 4 documentary about the Rendlesham Forest incident - US troops chasing strange lights thru the woods of a nuclear missile site - and they explained it away as being both a meteor AND a lighthouse. Something is up when Photek makes a better documentary than a multi-billion pound broadcaster.
Too late!
