sar·casmYes there are actually, just not on this forum.
/?sär?kaz?m/
Noun
The use of irony to mock or convey contempt.
Synonyms
irony
Yes, and I turned it into profit.By the way, have you seen someone about your ocd?
sar·casmYes there are actually, just not on this forum.
Yes, and I turned it into profit.By the way, have you seen someone about your ocd?
mhh... I forgot one thing among the others: the current global financial world crisis that will probably lead to a WW3. It started all... let me guess... U.S.A.?...Funk N. Furter wrote:Forge, This is why myrnova, me and the FT mention America a lot. Also because America has the world's biggest economy.myrnova wrote:
For the rest, as already said, it is not my fault if whatever crime or disaster in this world the U.S.A. are involved: you talk about environment? U.S.A. are the main responsable of the disaster. You talk about crimes against humanity? U.S.A. You talk about spied and controlled people's privacy? U.S.A. Pseudonazi propaganda and brainwashing? U.S.A. War, terrorism? U.S.A. Slavery? U.S.A. Torture? U.S.A. Racism? U.S.A. Death Penalty? U.S.A. Capitalism? U.S.A. etc. etc. etc.
myrnova wrote:probably lead to a WW3.
I can well believe that this was the case!! It's possible (read. probable) that Ableton have far more american customers than Italian ones....market forces and all....just say'n. (I've taken your shadx312 ref out because from what I've witnessed on this thread, he's got some exceptionally good insights about the world and america, like yourself).myrnova wrote:given that the KVR forum is moderated by some white pride fanatics, the reason of 9V be banned is very pathetic, actually: the moderator at the time (i guess german) claimed he knew well I wasn't rude, offensive or whatever at all, but explained me they had to ban me because american fellows could not understand my european "relativism", due to their limits and way of being conditioned by the state, and they percieed me being "offensive" against them, so they asked them to ban me, and they have a basis in LA or whatever... pathetic. ....
Do I? I'm reasonably happy with the way I talk to people, thanks.Funk N. Furter wrote:
Socialists are internationalists so we never criticise people on the basis of their nationality, it is a moronic thing to do. You need to differentiate between the two and stop being an apologist for people who get the wrong end of the stick andydes.
Thank you sir, they are kind words, and likewise I wish you well.andydes wrote:krulecello:
I apologise for my own small part in the big pile of shit your thread has become.
Keep up the good work.
Now you're getting the idea.H20nly wrote:b0unce was all anti american too. every chance he got, but he was at least a clever fella... not some damn parrot and broken record hybrid chirping the same thing over and over. he could comprehend what you write to him too. imagine that.
not that any of this is relevant.
viewtopic.php?f=40&t=122958&p=1295440#p1295440krulecello wrote:I couldn't resist a thread about Cycling
LoopStationZebra wrote:Which we will win. Again.myrnova wrote:probably lead to a WW3.

Thanks Shadx, once again you have demonstrated an ability for the greatest of clarity!! I take my hat of to you as this is the kind of intelligence that I really like to see. Your clarity and obvious creativity and wonderfully refreshing. All the Best.shadx312 wrote:
"So, viewers, as you can see, this thread is analogous to why the climate is in such terrible shape.
I'd like to apologize on behalf of MY SELF for participating in self-serving contributions to a negative climate.
Now, we return you back to the history lesson.
Again."
it doesn't. he just gets off on posting horrific photos... it excites him so much that sometimes he forgets about context before he clicks Submit with one hand while simultaneously patting himself on the back with the other.LoopStationZebra wrote:^How does that relate to winning WW3?
omfg.
I don't understand why you are claiming the thread has taken a "direction", as if it was somethng different. Forget the trolls (shadx something, jmcock, loostationzebra and others). Don't you think your thread ("climate change going beyond dangerous") and U.S.A. policy are related? I remember you the U.S.A. are the main responsable for this disaster: they have always refused to collaborate with the other countries, keeping on producing CO2 and spreading poison on the planet, in particular nuclear waste and oil. U.S.A. alone produce 38% of the entire pollution in the world. They always refuse UN resolutions for peace, progress and collaboration: both the ones against pollution and the one against malnutrition and death for disease in poor countries. They want to decide on everything and be the masters, see when they refused to give anti aids medicines in Africa causing millions dead, see kyoto protocol, see their criminal policies against so called "third world" debt, which is practically a new form of slavery: we can call it a holocaust. They guide and decide the policy of the I.M.F. which has caused the african holocaust and strangled exonomy in south america. They have always supported fascist dictatorships and obliged poor countries to follow neoliberal criminal policies. They spend something like 4.000.000.000 $ a year for war and weapons, most of them non-conventional. They start wars for nothing as soon as little events happen (see the twin towers). They used that little new york attack as a good excuse to begin a criminal war, brainwashing people that it is a "huge tragedy" or smth. When they have killed million of innocent people all over the world. Is that shit right and human? For me not, seems like the nazi germany: the rest of the world pretended not to see what happened in Germany, even if they knew well what was going on. What's the difference in terms of crimes?krulecello wrote:The direction that this thread has taken has not surprised me at all, in fact, I was relying on it doing so. (It's a reproducible exercise, as the 'Lounge' can attest to)